On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 03:39:59PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I have just committed the change below to disallow alternative syntaxes
> for DEP-5, since having, say, YAML in addition to RFC-822 style headers
> is silly. I did not discuss this beforehand since I do not expect anyone
> objecting
Given the large number of people who have worked on DEP-5 over the
years, a section acknowledging their work would be a good idea, I think.
Below is a start of one. Could someone who's been involved with this
longer than I have make a list of missing people?
=== modified file 'dep5.mdwn'
--- dep5.
I have just committed the change below to disallow alternative syntaxes
for DEP-5, since having, say, YAML in addition to RFC-822 style headers
is silly. I did not discuss this beforehand since I do not expect anyone
objecting to it at this stage of the DEP. It might have been relevant
early on in
On sam., 2010-08-28 at 11:50 +0200, emanuele carrea wrote:
> Here it is
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/great_pacific_garbage_patch_sticker-217837941260564597
>
> didn't know where to write it, but I think it's worth saying it.
Note that it's the swirl without Debian which is the “openuse” logo. See
Here it is
http://www.zazzle.com/great_pacific_garbage_patch_sticker-217837941260564597
didn't know where to write it, but I think it's worth saying it.
bye
On to, 2010-08-26 at 08:43 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The Files field needs to specify patterns on filenames. We need to
> specify how to do that.
Here is my understanding of the current situation:
* There is no particular consensus on filename patterns.
* Charles suggests a very simple glob
On to, 2010-08-26 at 08:57 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Comments on Comment?
>From the absence of further comments I assume there is consensus. If
I've overlooked anything, please tell me. Attached is the diff of the
changes I'm merging into the master draft.
=== modified file 'dep5.mdwn'
--- de
7 matches
Mail list logo
