Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > I have mixed feelings about adding a extra level of complexity and > introduce a syntax for lists. I think that apart from the Files field, > the DEP could use mostly free-form values in the fields. > In particular for the Copyright field, I am of the opinion that it > s

Re: webchat/cgiirc on irc.debian.org

2010-08-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I'm afraid I have idea what it would take to set this up and operate it, > though. Does a free software implementation exist? There are multiple web-based IRC clients and one or two Java applet ones, the only one available in Debian is cg

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Lars Wirzenius writes: > On la, 2010-08-21 at 01:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I was assuming that's how we'd get to a 1.1 version. I haven't read >> DEP-0 recently, though, so I guess I have a poor grasp of how this is >> supposed to work. I'll go review it. If we pick up the files in >> d

Re: webchat/cgiirc on irc.debian.org

2010-08-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On su, 2010-08-22 at 23:36 -0300, Valessio S Brito wrote: > The proposal is to have something similar to http://webchat.freenode.net/ > > Using cgiirc on webchat.debian.org or irc.debian.org or .net The one place I know that advertises a web IRC gateway is the Koha project (http://koha-community.

webchat/cgiirc on irc.debian.org

2010-08-22 Thread Valessio S Brito
Who could help implement an interface/site faster and easier for users and contributors from Debian? Many more people could present this in the channels of the teams related to debian. It would also be an opportunity to help these people get together and do something for the project. The

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On su, 2010-08-22 at 15:24 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > It's... okay. It's a little strange, but I don't think it would be > confusing since it is a summary of the license text in a machine-readable > format, in essence. ACK, you and Ben have assured me that it is acceptable, and I've changed the

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Ben Finney
Lars Wirzenius writes: > On su, 2010-08-22 at 16:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > If the extended description finally requires double space for > > verbatim display, then how abould calling the ‘special first line’ > > synopsis, to be closer to the vocabulary used in the specification > > of t

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Lars Wirzenius writes: > On su, 2010-08-22 at 16:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> If the extended description finally requires double space for verbatim >> display, then how abould calling the ‘special first line’ synopsis, to >> be closer to the vocabulary used in the specification of the >> D

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
I've attached the current diff for the general file syntax changes. === modified file 'dep5.mdwn' --- dep5.mdwn 2010-08-21 09:05:12 + +++ dep5.mdwn 2010-08-22 22:08:51 + @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ * Single-line values. * White space separated lists. * Line based lists. -* Free-form text formatted

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On su, 2010-08-22 at 16:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I also feel a contradiction to call ‘free-form’ some text that is formatted > according to some markup rules, even if they are simple. I propose to replace > instances like: > > Free-form text formatted like package long descriptions > >

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On la, 2010-08-21 at 22:30 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Can't we just "fold" long copyright header fields similarly? The issue is that one Copyright field (or header) will contain many copyright statements, and if we want to automatically parse those, we need a way to see where a new o

Re: UPDATE DEBIAN VER 2.1 ......AND MORE

2010-08-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 06:28:45PM +, loualich andre wrote: > HI . > if this mesage is send to you by mistake > please forward it to "whom it may concern" > I am sorry to say that yours websites look like all LINUX > TOO MUCH WORDS AND SCUM ABOUT NOTHING > >

Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’

2010-08-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:17:22PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: (Machiavelli was my pupil. All that he wrote in his little booklet he learned from the masterly way I direct Debian discussions.) +1 ...what I mean is: I acknowledge your power and let this point rest :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas S

Re: UPDATE DEBIAN VER 2.1 ......AND MORE

2010-08-22 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 22. 08. 2010 20:28:45 je loualich andre napisal(a): 1ST PROBLEM / I bought  some years ago  version 2.1 Hmmm ... I doubt you'll be able to sell it now. Perhaps to a museum? ALAS / 2 / VERSION 2.1 IS NO LONGER BOOTABLE Due to the y2k bug, no doubt ... WHEN SHALL WE SEE AT LAST A VERSI

UPDATE DEBIAN VER 2.1 ......AND MORE

2010-08-22 Thread loualich andre
HI . if this mesage is send to you by mistake please forward it to "whom it may concern" I am sorry to say that yours websites look like all LINUX TOO MUCH WORDS AND SCUM ABOUT NOTHING 1ST PROBLEM / I bought  some years ago  version 2.1 Alas ! my hope of  freed

FW: Request for application

2010-08-22 Thread miloud BMDN
Greetings I am Boumediene Bendermel, from Algeria, i am 33 years old, single, my job is a farmer i work in agriculture since 5 years of experience. I want to participate working there. Awaiting for your answer, accept my best compliments. Boumediene

Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’

2010-08-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:30:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I propose to rename the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’, Please don't. "Contact" would be often misinterpreted as "support" or "hotline": Greetings Marc --

Re: DEP-5: general file syntax

2010-08-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:09:28PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > +There are four kinds values for fields. Each field specifies which > +kind is allowed. > +i > +* Single-line values. > +* White space separated lists. > +* Line based lists. > +* Free-form text formatted like package long des