Re: version numbering question

2009-11-10 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-11-10, Sam Ward wrote: > --0016e64b98eaed04bc047807b3b8 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > The kdebase package currently is listed as 5:55. Is this an internal Debian > reference and how could I determine which version of the kdebase it > reflects? the kdebase binary packa

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog writes: > Luk proposed a new freeze date of march 2010: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html Ah, this message came in while I was on vacation and I somehow missed it. Thank you. This answers my questions. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

version numbering question

2009-11-10 Thread Sam Ward
The kdebase package currently is listed as 5:55. Is this an internal Debian reference and how could I determine which version of the kdebase it reflects? Thank you. Sam Ward

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Luk Claes
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Sure, if most DDs have just took that mail as a proposal that they can >> safely ignore, the release team should probably be more precise, but I >> doubt the substance will be anything else than what we have now. (I also >>

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Sure, if most DDs have just took that mail as a proposal that they can > safely ignore, the release team should probably be more precise, but I > doubt the substance will be anything else than what we have now. (I also > duly notice that the release

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote: > If you're talking about the Ubuntu release team that's up to them. If > you talk about the Debian release team then I don't think so. A > proposale is a proposal not a policy. I don't get your point. How do you go from a proposed freeze date to a defin

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:11:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html > > But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs > > to set a date in st

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Luk proposed a new freeze date of march 2010: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html > > But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs > to set a date in stone now. Does it?

Re: squeeze release cycle?

2009-11-10 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Raphael! * Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-10 00:36]: > But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs > to set a date in stone now. If you're talking about the Ubuntu release team that's up to them. If you talk about the Debian release team then I don't think so. A proposale