On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:15:57PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> A closer reading of the DEP-5 wording clears this up for me:
> However it makes for easier reading if the copyright
> file lists the “main” license first: the one matching
> the “top level” of the work, with others li
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:25:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
> > I forsee that it is very difficult because of the hundreds of borders in
> > our world, but Debian could support companies started by its developers
> > to make a living of their Debian-related activities
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:39:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> - Policy does not require to document the repackaging in README.source ;
>>debian/copyright is the right place for this.
> Yes and no. README.source guidelines from policy include this point
> (p
Sune Vuorela writes:
> On 2009-09-09, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>c marketing to new developers: posters to put up at universities?
>> T-shirts or other gifts for new people working on bug-fixes,
>> translations etc.? Could be useful, but again expensive.
>> Thoughts?
> I have so
Charles Plessy writes:
> I forsee that it is very difficult because of the hundreds of borders in
> our world, but Debian could support companies started by its developers
> to make a living of their Debian-related activities, by contributing to
> their capital. This way, Debian would invest in
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:39:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would like to hear some comments about the following. Since the git
> repositories contain all the history, if a non-free file slips in and
> is discovered after many commits were made, it will be a pain to
> extirpate it. For the
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:39:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> - Policy does not require to document the repackaging in README.source ;
>debian/copyright is the right place for this.
Yes and no. README.source guidelines from policy include this point
(policy §4.14):
4. Optionally, doc
Dear all,
here is a tentative summary of the thread, followed by my personnal
contribution.
The original question is whether we should allow the package maintainers to
ignore some non-DFSG-free (but legally redistributable) files in our source
packages if we can build binary package without them,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 05:49:18PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello Steve and everybody,
>
> I forsee that it is very difficult because of the hundreds of borders in our
> world, but Debian could support companies started by its developers to make a
> living of their Debian-related activities,
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-09-09, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> 1 New hardware / equipment
>>
>>a The DSA team have a wishlist of new hardware they'd like, along
>> with a set of donated machines that need configuring and/or
>> shipping. As far as I'm concerned, so long as the individ
On 2009-09-09, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> 1 New hardware / equipment
>
>a The DSA team have a wishlist of new hardware they'd like, along
> with a set of donated machines that need configuring and/or
> shipping. As far as I'm concerned, so long as the individual
> requests here lo
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:04:42PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [2009-09-10 16:01]:
> > > Steve McIntyre writes:
> > > > 4 Marketing stuff:
> > > >a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> > > > expos. Might be usefu
Hello Steve and everybody,
I forsee that it is very difficult because of the hundreds of borders in our
world, but Debian could support companies started by its developers to make a
living of their Debian-related activities, by contributing to their capital.
This way, Debian would invest in its ow
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:04:42PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [2009-09-10 16:01]:
> > Steve McIntyre writes:
> > > 4 Marketing stuff:
> > >a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> > > expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where d
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:16:38PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:12:18 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
> I'm very much in favour of something like this. Debian is better off
> without schilyware imo.
it's sadly not only about shilly. Some tuomoware i
15 matches
Mail list logo
