Hi,
We have a significant amount of money, but I would not define it as a
"huge amount".
> There's quite a long list, in *rough* order of the priority I would
> (personally) give them so far.
> 1 New hardware / equipment
> 2 Fund developer gatherings:
My full support to spend money on thi
The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been
activated:
andrea.ver...@gmail.com
Full name: Andrea Veri
Added key: D78CDED2EDC8D9BA4807E817DA8622AE93EBF6D8
benjamin.dr...@gmail.com
Full name: Benjamin Drung
Added key: A62D2CFBD50B9B5BF360D54B159EB5C4EFC8
Magnus Holmgren writes:
> I have a different example: Upstream bundles a couple of libraries
> (unmodified source tarballs + modified versions of some files), which
> happen to contain some tiny non-free bits (like RFCs and GFDL-licensed
> documentation with cover texts).
I also find repackaging
On måndagen den 7 september 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:01:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > in one of the packages I mainatain, upstream left some zlib and ncurses
> > static libraries for Win32 in the source tarball.
>
> IMHO it is always a good idea to remove crap
> Steve McIntyre writes:
> > 4 Marketing stuff:
> >a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> > expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where do we store
> > it/them? Who organises shipping?
>
> I think this is something which we should pursue. I genera
Hi,
Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Yes. There's a kindof "market point" I've been wishing on Debian for
years "knowing" that it simply could happen: certifications and generally
rising attention to commercial producers, both hardware and (free/open)
software.
I think there's right now a thread on
6 matches
Mail list logo
