Hi, Alexander:
On Thursday 10 September 2009 22:11:24 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jesús M. Navarro schrieb:
> >> 4 Marketing stuff:
>
> [..]
>
> > So, if Debian can be truly so great for companies from IBM to Alfresco,
> > to Oracle (and the end result can be so great for we, mere
> In terms of rationale, I think it's clear that we do *not* have to
> package every piece of Free Software that is available to us. If we
> can't have a sensible relationship with the upstream developers, then
> I believe it would be better not to expose Debian and our users to the
> problems tha
>> Thoughts?
> I'm very much in favour of something like this. Debian is better off
> without schilyware imo.
This isnt special to that. We had/have other people as upstreams we
might not like. (How about the one that purposely added broken code in a
way that it will run on every users system bu
>> There has been some discussion in the last couple of years about
>> whether or not Debian should distribute software that was written by
>> developers that we consider to be "hostile".
> In my opinion, the current recommendation in the developer references
> is enough for now:
Different thing.
Hi!
Jesús M. Navarro schrieb:
>> 4 Marketing stuff:
[..]
> So, if Debian can be truly so great for companies from IBM to Alfresco, to
> Oracle (and the end result can be so great for we, mere users), how is it
> that we won't have "certified" stuff from them? It can't be the platform or
> e
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 00:57 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>> 1 New hardware / equipment
>>
>>a The DSA team have a wishlist of new hardware they'd like […]
> Full ack. Hardware is not that expensive, lack of hardware should not
> hold back any of our dev
Hi, Steve:
On Thursday 10 September 2009 01:57:14 Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> 4 Marketing stuff:
Yes. There's a kindof "market point" I've been wishing on Debian for
years "knowing" that it simply could happen: certifications and generally
rising attention to commercial producers, both har
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:27:53PM +0200, matouskova.barb...@centrum.cz wrote:
> I have a question about debian trademark. I am trying to find out
> whether I can use debian logo when making a shirt and I came across
> your quotation:
[..]
Yes you can, see : http://www.debian.org/logos/
You can e
Frans Pop :
> IMO it is not up to us to decide to pass on money donated to us to other
> projects. If sponsors and donors feel Gnash is worth sponsoring, they
> will do so themselves. Money donated to Debian should be spent on Debian.
I'm not a DD but I already helped runnning debian booths in
Hello,
I have a question about debian trademark. I am trying to find out whether I can
use debian logo when making a shirt and I came across your quotation:
"We allow all businesses to make reasonable use of the Debian trademark. For
example, if you make a CD of our Debian GNU/Linux distributi
Hi,
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [2009-09-10 16:01]:
> Steve McIntyre writes:
> > 4 Marketing stuff:
> >a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> > expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where do we store
> > it/them? Who organises shipping?
>
> I think
On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>If someone really want to maintain such package, we should not
>>prohibit it, but we should make it clear that it is strongly
>>recommended to not maintain such package, and that th
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Giacomo A. Catenazzi]
>> It is useful not only for Debian, so IMHO Debian could donate some
>> money, but only if other big distributions (RedHat, SuSe/Novel,
>> Ubuntu, etc.) do the same.
>
> I find this to be a rather useless re
[Giacomo A. Catenazzi]
> It is useful not only for Debian, so IMHO Debian could donate some
> money, but only if other big distributions (RedHat, SuSe/Novel,
> Ubuntu, etc.) do the same.
I find this to be a rather useless requirement to have, unless the
goal is to do nothing. If something is a go
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>[Steve McIntyre]
>> There has been some discussion in the last couple of years about
>> whether or not Debian should distribute software that was written by
>> developers that we consider to be "hostile".
>
>In my opinion, the cu
On Thursday 10 September 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> It is useful not only for Debian, so IMHO Debian could donate some
> money, but only if other big distributions (RedHat, SuSe/Novel, Ubuntu,
> etc.) do the same.
Even then not IMO. Those other distributions are commercial, Debian is
not
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Frans Pop]
b Gnash. Petter is very keen on this, but I'm not so sure. Don't
they have other ways to get funding? Thoughts?
I don't think Debian as a project should sponsor upstream
development. That's up to individual DDs.
A working free software implemen
[Frans Pop]
>> 6 Fund other related projects
>>
>>a Debian Edu. Clearly good for us to do - heavily linked with
>> Debian.
>
> Not sure about that. IMO it's up to the schools and governmental
> institutions that use Debian Edu to sponsor that. However, I have
> no problem with Debian sp
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 10 September 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > 5 Pay people to do stuff we don't/can't/won't:
>
> g website redesign and restructuring
>This is something we seem unable to make any progress at and that
>is very much overdue. Especially the restruc
On Thursday 10 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > 6 Fund other related projects
> >
> > b Gnash. Petter is very keen on this, but I'm not so sure. Don't
> > they have other ways to get funding? Thoughts?
>
> I don't think Debian as a project should sponsor upstream development.
> That's
On 2009-09-10, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 10 September 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> 5 Pay people to do stuff we don't/can't/won't:
>
> g website redesign and restructuring
>This is something we seem unable to make any progress at and that
>is very much overdue. Especial
Steve McIntyre writes:
> 4 Marketing stuff:
>a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where do we store
> it/them? Who organises shipping?
I think this is something which we should pursue. I generally have the
i
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:12:18 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Thoughts?
>
I'm very much in favour of something like this. Debian is better off
without schilyware imo.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Thursday 10 September 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> 5 Pay people to do stuff we don't/can't/won't:
g website redesign and restructuring
This is something we seem unable to make any progress at and that
is very much overdue. Especially the restructuring part would
invo
2009-09-10, Steve McIntyre:
> Hi folks,
>
> Suggestions and comments from others
>
>
[...]
>
> 6 Fund other related projects
>
>a Debian Edu. Clearly good for us to do - heavily linked with
> Debian.
>
I think that this could be really intere
Steve McIntyre wrote:
1 New hardware / equipment
a The DSA team have a wishlist of new hardware they'd like, along
with a set of donated machines that need configuring and/or
shipping. As far as I'm concerned, so long as the individual
requests here look reasonable then they
Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 00:57 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> 1 New hardware / equipment
>
>a The DSA team have a wishlist of new hardware they'd like […]
Full ack. Hardware is not that expensive, lack of hardware should not
hold back any of our development.
> b Maintainers of big pa
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It seems to me that these consulting businesses would be good
> > addresses to ask for sponsorship of a Debian/GNU/Linux booth if there
> > is no way getting a free booth for a charitable association such as
> > the Debian Project
[Steve McIntyre]
> There has been some discussion in the last couple of years about
> whether or not Debian should distribute software that was written by
> developers that we consider to be "hostile".
In my opinion, the current recommendation in the developer references
is enough for now:
If
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > > There's a german association, "Linux user in der Kirche"[1] (Linux user
> > > > in the church), which plans to organize a booth on the next big meeting
> > > > of the german church in 2010.
> > > > They aim is to promote th
Thomas Koch wrote:
> > Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > There's a german association, "Linux user in der Kirche"[1] (Linux user
> > > in the church), which plans to organize a booth on the next big meeting
> > > of the german church in 2010.
> > > They aim is to promote the usage of linux in the administra
> Thomas Koch wrote:
> > There's a german association, "Linux user in der Kirche"[1] (Linux user
> > in the church), which plans to organize a booth on the next big meeting
> > of the german church in 2010.
> > They aim is to promote the usage of linux in the administrations of
> > church communiti
Thomas Koch wrote:
> There's a german association, "Linux user in der Kirche"[1] (Linux user in
> the
> church), which plans to organize a booth on the next big meeting of the
> german
> church in 2010.
> They aim is to promote the usage of linux in the administrations of church
> communities
33 matches
Mail list logo
