On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:26:07 -0300, Marga wrote:
> This has been one of the main concerns of the December freeze, apart
> from the fact that we wouldn't meet our release goals, that you are
> suggesting how to solve. Ubuntu has shown in the past a tendency to
> ship with the latest versions of soft
On Mon Aug 10 21:08, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> >> I think that's just you. There has been no decision by the project to
> >> change the license requirements for non-free, and if the ftp masters have
> >> decided this, they haven't disclosed it anywhere appropriate.
> > Indeed, last time I checked,
>> I think that's just you. There has been no decision by the project to
>> change the license requirements for non-free, and if the ftp masters have
>> decided this, they haven't disclosed it anywhere appropriate.
> Indeed, last time I checked, the requirement was that Debian is allowed
> to red
Floris Bruynooghe schreef:
> To the original poster: Maybe a better place to ask is
> debian-u...@lists.debian.org (I couldn't find a dutch version of the
> user list so you'd still have to try to speak engish).
In short there will be a dutch version:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
also sprach Wouter Verhelst [2009.08.08.1500 +0200]:
> They are sticking to that promise. Of all the derivative
> distributions out there, Ubuntu is the only one that actively, as
> a matter of policy, does contribute back bugreports and patches.
They contribute, but they're far from the only one
5 matches
Mail list logo
