Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > > > > * DDs which are not active for 2 years or more automatically loose > vote and upload rights. > > * Activity is defined as not having neither v

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/07/09 at 01:10 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > MIA is also about detecting packages that are de-facto orphaned, not > > just about developers. Actually, I think that it's more important > > that we work on detecting packag

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > MIA is also about detecting packages that are de-facto orphaned, not > just about developers. Actually, I think that it's more important > that we work on detecting packages that are badly maintained, rather > than on detecting inact

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/07/09 at 18:49 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > I have nothing against this in principle, but how is this any > > different from the people who manage the MIA database? > > The main difference is the automation of the pro

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:44:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > * DDs which are not active for 2 years or more automatically loose > >   vote and upload rights. > > s/loose/lose/ Thanks, bad typo. > I guess in practice that means: have their

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I have nothing against this in principle, but how is this any > different from the people who manage the MIA database? The main difference is the automation of the process. MIA, which currently is 1 person, requires manual activity

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > --- > > * DDs which are not active for 2 years or more automatically loose >   vote and upload rights. s/loose/lose/ I guess in practice that means: have their key removed fr

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [ The original post I'm replying to is at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00145.html ] > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > I do not like the way Joerg wants to change the

Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

2009-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
[ The original post I'm replying to is at http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00145.html ] On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I do not like the way Joerg wants to change the way people become and > are members of the Debian project. It's not all bad,

Re: dsa meeting minutes

2009-07-22 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote: > (again, internal work notes) > > dsa 20090720 > > - get rid of sarti hosted at rapidswitch (weasel talks to philh) > - mirror planet to a different machine so we can reboot things > more easily (mirroradm/Ganneff) > - setup manpages.debian.net >