Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Kęstutis Biliūnas wrote:
Say the truth to each loser would be more honestly, I think.
One such unfortunate,
So you think you are a loser? I don't think so. What I know from your AM is that
your progress towards becoming DD and knowing all the things a DD needs to
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>
>> Something is definitely wrong here, IMHO.
>
> Maybe it's your assumption or assertion that the only point of NEW is
> checking the copyright file.
It is my assumption that this is the part of NEW that is the most time
cons
Kęstutis Biliūnas wrote:
> And why you still leave those losers, who during the 2...3 years, failed
> to become a DD? Rather, they only cause damage to Debian. All of them
> should be removed from the MN queue. Only problem in that the need for
> each of them to explain the reasons why he is reject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Zeimetz rašė:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> Also, after one or two years in NM, you might have some new things to
>> say about you, and your interests in Debian might change, so an updated
>> introduction would be interesting, indeed.
>
> The NM
Mark Brown (25/06/2009):
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:46:50PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > I didn't think that using the templates was required for AMs, merely
> > a useful tool. I think AMs should be able to check to their
> > satisfaction in other ways as appropriate, as long as it produces
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Ahh... the old dear bureaucracy!
> "It is not my task, so go away and never come back" ;-)
>
> Is it so difficult that a cronjob will call two scripts and merge the
> results
> in a single mail?
yes.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux D
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Also, after one or two years in NM, you might have some new things to
> say about you, and your interests in Debian might change, so an updated
> introduction would be interesting, indeed.
The NM process should not take two years. If it does, there is something clearly
goi
7 matches
Mail list logo
