I use b...@packages.debian.org to contact the maintainer of "blah". I
use this to alert maintainers of reverse build-deps when I do
something drastic to one of the libraries I maintain.
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Thanks,
-Steve
si
Stephen Gran wrote:
> day from elsewhere. I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems
> pretty clear so far that the domain does not get any significant amount
> of legitimate mail from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
>
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
>> The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
>> keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
>> and the subsequent translations.
>
> This one time, at band camp, Adeodato
Stephen Gran wrote:
> It sounds like the service should probably stay open. I would have been
> happy to restrict something that is only a spam attractor, but if it's
> more than that, than I'm happy people find it a useful service. If the
> teams who do use it think it can still be useful and b
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> What about requiring a GPG signed email by key in developers or
> maintainers keyring?
As others have already mentioned, the addresses are also intended as
contact point for upstream developers and users, i.e. people who don't
have such a key
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debia
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
>
On Fri 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
> day from elsewhere. I haven't don
8 matches
Mail list logo
