Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 20:09 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Either Social Contract section one and the DFSG prohibit the
>>> distribution of a non-free blob in the release, or they do not.
>> This 'in the release' is bogus, I guess you mean in 'main'?
>
> Debian is only fr
On 2009-05-13, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> DFSG is a guideline and a target: we must no go far as the nearest point
>> we reached, but it still a guideline.
>> Consider:
>> - we never had a full DFSG Debian (also when DFSG was written)
>> - we have "RC" also on stable releases. What should we do
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:53 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>
> DFSG is a guideline and a target: we must no go far as the nearest point
> we reached, but it still a guideline.
> Consider:
> - we never had a full DFSG Debian (also when DFSG was written)
> - we have "RC" also on stable releases.
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 20:09 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Either Social Contract section one and the DFSG prohibit the
> > distribution of a non-free blob in the release, or they do not.
>
> This 'in the release' is bogus, I guess you mean in 'main'?
Debian is only free software. Non-free is distr
Cyril Brulebois (13/05/2009):
> From keycheck.sh:
> | echo "Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key"
> | VERSION=$(gpg ${GPGOPTS} --with-colons --with-fingerprint --list-keys
> 0x$KEYID | awk -F : '$1 == "fpr" {print length($10)}')
Bleh, missed the actually interesting lines:
| if [ $VERSIO
Frank Küster (13/05/2009):
> I don't read blogs. So I'm confused by people asking here and on
> -private about something that sounds as if one should be kind of aware
> of it...
>
> How can I find out if my key is v3 or v4?
From keycheck.sh:
| echo "Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key"
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am getting quite confused after reading the many blog announcements about
> changing PGP keys for security reasons.
I don't read blogs. So I'm confused by people asking here and on
-private about something that sounds as if one should be kind of aware
of
On Tue, May 12 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 06:59:41PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> On Sun May 10 18:34, Luk Claes wrote:
>> > > 3. Option X overrides a foundation document, possibly temporarily (?)
>> >
>> > Not possible. You can only override a decision and amendin
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:06 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I think this is the core of the disagreement. I do not call it a
temporary override of a foundation document; I call it a temporary
practical consensus between "the needs of our users" and "the needs of
the free
9 matches
Mail list logo
