Re: lenny release at epoche 1234567890 ?

2009-02-10 Thread Gebhardt Thomas
Hi, On Tuesday 10 February 2009 20:04, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > In [2]:datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1234567890) > Out[2]:datetime.datetime(2009, 2, 13, 23, 31, 30) > > Seems about half an hour before the 14th. oh, indead. I accidentally used local time. That's a pity! Thanks, Thomas --

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Luk Claes schrieb: >> Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 Lenny to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian >> Developer who died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident. > There seems to be a part of the sentence missing... Thanks, fixed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Luk Claes
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: === Dedication Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 Lenny to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian Developer who died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident. There seems to be a part of the sentence missing... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
[ dropping some lists from CC since the involved people are either subscribed somewhere else or BCCed ] Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb: > The most current version may be found in a private subversion repository > (to avoid conflicts when using the wiki). You can get the most recent > versio

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > What about: > > ... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages > (build from over 12,000 source packages). Perfect! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 08:54:02PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > W. Martin Borgert schrieb: > > > It's difficult to change all occurrences at the same time. Why > > not start with the release announcement and explicitly say 1x000 > > *source* packages? Let's change it in other

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
W. Martin Borgert (10/02/2009): > On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > > What about: > > > > ... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages > > (build from over 12,000 source packages). built? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! W. Martin Borgert schrieb: > It's difficult to change all occurrences at the same time. Why > not start with the release announcement and explicitly say 1x000 > *source* packages? Let's change it in other documents/pages when > we're at them. Counting binary packages feels a little bit like >

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-10 18:50, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Yes the 23'000 are the binary packages for i386. Oh, I better correct that > to 22'000 to reflect other archs, too. > > I took the number of binary packages, because we usually take the number of > binary packages. It was in the last announc

Re: lenny release at epoche 1234567890 ?

2009-02-10 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Gebhardt Thomas wrote: > just noticed that epoche 1234567890 is at 2009-02-14. That would be > a release date that is easy to remember. f...@laurie:~$ ipython In [1]:import datetime In [2]:datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1234567890) Out[2]:datetime.da

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Gunnar! Gunnar Wolf schrieb: >> > > Umh... This paragraph seems to clump together very disparate > concepts. Yes, they are installer-related - Maybe it should be > rephrased +- this way: [..] > Now, Etch already included the out-of-the-box encryption support - I > wrote an article on Februar

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Adeodato Simó schrieb: > Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow: Thanks for the feedback; I applied your changes / added FIXME so I won't forget them. >> Hypervisor 3.2.1, OpenJDK 6b11 and more than 23,000 other ready to use >> software packages. > > I don't

Re: lenny release at epoche 1234567890 ?

2009-02-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Gebhardt Thomas (10/02/2009): > just noticed that epoche 1234567890 is at 2009-02-14. That would be a > release date that is easy to remember. <49862854.1070...@googlemail.com> Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

lenny release at epoche 1234567890 ?

2009-02-10 Thread Gebhardt Thomas
Hi, just noticed that epoche 1234567890 is at 2009-02-14. That would be a release date that is easy to remember. Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

2009-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Gunnar Wolf: > Now, Etch already included the out-of-the-box encryption support - I > wrote an article on February 2007 specifically talking about this > feature. I agree with announcing the graphical interface here, as it > was hidden by default, but AFAIK the crypto part was already there (of