On 2009-01-17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> kde
> ---
> Ups - is this project dying or has the list activity just moved
> to an different mailing list???
The project is going fine. You are looking at the "user list", but KDE
is so easy to use for everyone that user support mostly isn't
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Right - the statistics themselves are interesting, but the
> > assumption that more list posting is better is an unhealthy one.
>
> Could you please quote where I said this.
You conflate low mailing list activity with “ac
Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> At least debian-qa is "maintainer" of an increasing amount of packages
> and I always wonder who is a reliable coworker (is available and avtive
> over a long time period). This conclusion can not be drawn out of the
> currently avaibale list statistics on lists.debian
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > For instance, I was gratified to see the statistics for debian-legal,
> > because they support my position that the discussion there is being DoSed by
> > non-DDs who are trying to use it as a forum to persuade Deb
Andreas Tille wrote:
>> And in the comments on debian-qa, Andreas, you conclude that QA is important
>> and it would be good to see a wider base - but the debian-qa list is only a
>> very small segment of the overall QA activity in Debian, most of which
>> doesn't need centralized coordination...
* Steve Langasek:
> I thought complaining about sending these to each list would be "cure worse
> than the disease". But if you're keeping score and taking the raw number of
> approvals vs. disapprovals as an endorsement, then count me among the
> disapprovers.
Me too.
Also note that publishing
Steve Langasek wrote:
> For instance, I was gratified to see the statistics for debian-legal,
> because they support my position that the discussion there is being DoSed by
> non-DDs who are trying to use it as a forum to persuade Debian that their
> interpretation of the DFSG is the correct one.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
Right - the statistics themselves are interesting, but the assumption that
more list posting is better is an unhealthy one.
Could you please quote where I said this. Perhaps I described
some things to simple - but I hope I did not this kind of
oversi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:18:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Geez instead of spamming every Debian list and making you the top
>> poster in terms of number of Debian lists today, what about announcing
>> this no -project and/or -devel and in the next
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:12:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:59:23PM +, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > www
> > ---
> > While Josip Rodin was very active on this list he failed
> > in finding a new activist after he became quiet since 2003.
> > Frank Lichte
Andreas Tille wrote:
> openoffice
> ---
> Rene, please try to form a real team around Openoffice!!!
No comment except my reply on -openoffice directly. Get your facts
straight, please.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:59:23PM +, Andreas Tille wrote:
> www
> ---
> While Josip Rodin was very active on this list he failed
> in finding a new activist after he became quiet since 2003.
> Frank Lichtenheld and Matt Kraai tried to fullfill this role
> but it seems we need m
Andreas Tille wrote:
> legal
> ---
> The quite often observed wave-shaped pattern and only a view
> activists left to discuss legal problems.
I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
illumi
13 matches
Mail list logo
