On Sat, 03 Jan 2009, Chris Waters wrote:
> Part of the problem is that we never have "no, just no" on our
> ballots, so the only alternative is to vote "further discussion",
> even if you have no interest whatsoever in any further discussion,
> and, as far as you're concerned, the matter is settled
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> > you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)
>
> Bad, bad idea! What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussio
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó [090101 23:36]:
> > No. In my opinion, an option in the ballot is (should be) a very scarce
> > resource. Like you would in a situation of limited water supply in a
> > boat shared with friends, you should act res
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)
Bad, bad idea! What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussion"
as 1, but staill have a compromise you'd be wil
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:47:39PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm not sure that I find it usefully different, unless what you're
> proposing is a compromise that you hope everyone will be able to agree
> upon.
I think that's a hugely important ability. I'm also worried that
setting the thresho
Hi, thanks
I do not know why I misunderstood the correct meaning of coercion
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/coercion/
Now I know.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 05:07:43PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I am sick of seeing too many votes/policy-discussion/... to force other
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:41:56PM +1030, Ron wrote:
>It seems quite clear that recent (ab)uses of the GR process have had
>little positive and immense negative affects on the project. And I
>don't mean that in the sense that "My Favourite Option Ma
y=-x
-
Visit www.nyc.gov/hhc
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this E-Mail may be
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, d
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If an option can't get seconds enough to pass K (or Q), it doesn't
> > have support in the DD population or the proposers are lazy, and don't
> > want to find enough support. In either case, people's time shouldn't
> > be wasted wit
9 matches
Mail list logo