On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:18:02PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 1: I'd be happier, though, if those proposing and seconding options
> > would be more careful about the effects that their options may have,
> > and be more vigilant about withdrawing op
Adeodato Simó writes:
> * Ben Finney [Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:17:28 +1100]:
>
> > > You should not write options you are not going to rank first,
> > > because the people who do care about that option winning should
> > > get to decide what's the wording that reflects their complete
> > > opinion an
* Ben Finney [Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:17:28 +1100]:
> > You should not write options you are not going to rank first,
> > because the people who do care about that option winning should get
> > to decide what's the wording that reflects their complete opinion
> > and concerns.
> The people who do car
Adeodato Simó writes:
> * Ben Finney [Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:43:44 +1100]:
>
> > Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > > You should not be proposing or seconding an option that you
> > > don't plan on ranking first.
(Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that you
don't plan on ranking ab
* Ben Finney [Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:43:44 +1100]:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > You should not be proposing or seconding an option that you don't
> > plan on ranking first.
> This seems quite wrong. Why should one not carefully and precisely
> phrase and propose an option that one does *not* agree
5 matches
Mail list logo
