Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...]
> I'm not aware of any software with such a feature that would fit for
> Debian. I also couldn't find any in a quick search. [...]
It sounded a lot like the old GroupLens usenet tool to me.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/GroupLens.html
Th
Sorry for the late reply, but I've been so frustrated with things over the
past week that I decided to take a break and see how things worked out
first.
On Monday 15 December 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Frans Pop [Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:09:28 +0100]:
> > Because any votes below FD do not count t
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:47:41 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So, are there going to be guide;lines for this voting on emails?
> On /., when one moderates, there are clear labels: troll, off-topic,
> flamebait, etc.
I think labels or tags would indeed be useful to have a structured
way
Hi Charles,
Le Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:31:31AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> A long exchange between two people can be interesting, or not.
Hi Filipus,
it is exactly because it can not be known if a long exchange is interesting
before reading it that tools to ignore long exchanges can be
On Monday 22 December 2008 07:47:41 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> So, are there going to be guide;lines for this voting on emails?
I'm afraid that I'm not able answer such a question, but I can try to provide
a contra-argument (just to prove it wrong or maybe right) -- if we follo
Hello,
Maybe it is the time to consider evolving and improving
the Enrico Zini proposal [0].
Also, could be interesting to build a social comittee with
people from diverse countries and cultural background.
Some actions/words could become a serious problem at some social
environments.
Could a ki
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:49:44AM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > * "Vocal minority" dominates "silent majority" by contributing a
> > disproportionate amount of list traffic, [...]
>
> Note that voting can have a similar drawback -
Le Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:31:31AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> A long exchange between two people can be interesting, or not.
Hi Filipus,
it is exactly because it can not be known if a long exchange is interesting
before reading it that tools to ignore long exchanges can be useful. The me
Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...]
> I'm not aware of any software with such a feature that would fit for
> Debian. I also couldn't find any in a quick search. [...]
It sounded a lot like the old GroupLens usenet tool to me.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/GroupLens.html
The b
George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 20 December 2008 21:33:27 MJ Ray wrote:
> > So, people who remain on the debian mailing lists have a poor
> > understanding of what should appear a good mailing list,
>
> What makes you think that "vocal minority" is larger than "silent majority"
> in
> debia
10 matches
Mail list logo
