http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips and
mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match reality
as both only have a single buildd (alpha: goetz; mips: ball; mipsel: rem).
Both mips and mipsel also currently seem to be having problems keeping
On 27/11/2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.6, the following
> changes to the keyring have been made:
>
> dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Full name: Aur�lien G�R�ME
(rewritten w/o half-broken encoding, maybe it would be nice to send
mails using something different
[ late, but for the records. ]
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> linhdd introduce binary abs_fdisk which was modified copy of fdisk
> from new version 0.4. It was arch:all before that too, and previous
> maintainer set it to arch:all saying 'it will save achieve space'.
hu?? the previous maintainer, me, did
I could not find a relevant address to send this to. I hope that you will
share this with everyone you can. Thank you so much for all the work and
effort to produce *Debian.* I have been using Linux for 5 years and Debian
for 2 of those years- Debian is the best for me.
Hi,
four people have checked the spam web form submissions concerning
debian-project. More background can be found at [1]. Thanks to Bas
Wijnen, Paul Wise, and Richard Hecker for reviewing! (Of course, a
special mention to Y Giridhar Appaji Nag who already looked through
debian-devel, but that isn
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:38:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:51:35PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > What information does linhdd need from fdisk?
> > Fdisk seems to run just fine as a normal user on Debian. The issues
> > seems to be that /dev/{s,h}d* are dire
With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.6, the following
changes to the keyring have been made:
dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full name: Aurélien GÃ\x89RÃ\x94ME
dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full name: Manuel Prinz
Added key: 802EB746852F21A39239C111F16961C8CC8D7957
dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
Steve Langasek wrote:
> No, that would be a security hole. Even making it setgid disk would be a
> security hole, since the disk group has write access to all disk devices.
I didn't mean a simple wrapper around the binary, I meant a wrapper
around the binary with a specific set of arguments, lock
On Nov 27, 2007 1:29 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 6:09 AM, Pedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I suggest include the driver :
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vodafone_Mobile_Connect_Card_driver_for_Linux
> >
> > in Debian.
>
> Looks like it already contains Debian
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:44:50PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> As people have already explained, this is not the first mistake people
> have commited. And at the same time, I agree that it was a grave
> mistake on my part and I publicly apologize for this mistake. If you
> care to r
10 matches
Mail list logo
