Lars Wirzenius dijo [Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:08:55PM +]:
> After some discussion on two Finnish Debian IRC channels, we decided to
> have a distributed pancake party, and beers in a bar afterwards.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/SocialContractTenYears is the co-ordination page.
> Other countries a
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This might well be the case. But I can see where an informed
electorate can make a different decision for party selection if they
keep cultural diversity in mind. So the practical solution might be as
simple as adding a note to the charter of
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:54:53 +0200 (CEST), Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I am not talking about _not_ having a soc-ctte. I am talking about
>> whether or not the selection criteria for ctte members needs to be
>> looked at with due consid
Hi Javier,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Attached is a first draft of such a page. I would appreciate input on this
> information as I would like to add it to the website soonish. Please note
> that it just states facts, it does not go into any o
On Monday 02 July 2007 17:26, Jens Seidel wrote:
> comitee or comittee?
committee even :-)
pgpIUBdnkry1R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(CC'ing debian-project as there might be people in that list that might
have an opinion about this change)
As most developers (me included) are not very much aware of the status of the
Debian trademark I believe it would be interesting to add a page to the
website that described more information
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:29:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> To clarify, in the message Sven doesn't talk about himself at all. He just
> makes points about his opinion on the "Social Committe" proposal. They could
> be points made by anyone else.
>
I see no good reasons to forward messa
Hi,
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> No. On that, I sympathise with Josip Rodin's views in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/06/msg00244.html
> that it's not a role listmasters have been wanting or expecting.
> I think we need to do something else. For example, list-admins.
>
>
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:03, MJ Ray wrote:
> No. On that, I sympathise with Josip Rodin's views in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/06/msg00244.html
> that it's not a role listmasters have been wanting or expecting.
> I think we need to do something else. For example, list-admins.
>
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we need to do something else. For example, list-admins.
Have you discussed this with the listmasters (ie. how difficult it
would be to grant list-admins the power to enforce bans on lists)? If
the listmasters don't see any difficulties, I would like to
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, MJ Ray wrote: [...]
> > It's not soc-ctte or nothing! We could take smaller steps first!
>
> Sounds like out of context quoting.
Well, my complaint isn't about the whole of the message, but that - as
you've later written - your argume
11 matches
Mail list logo
