On 13/06/2007, at 8:35 PM, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I guess that depends on what you consider "joined". You might also
consider your first posting to a Debian mailing list. Or
possible, your
first contribution (e.g., b
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:35:25 +0300, Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> I guess that depends on what you consider "joined". You might also
>> consider your first posting to a Debian mailing list. Or possible,
>> your first contribution (e.g., bug submission o
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:01:47 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:09:19AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> So, I suspsect that I crafted the modemu changelog manually and had
>> either a braino or a typo.
> Common in those days, ISTR. It predates dch (from de
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:11:42 +0200 (CEST), Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> every years for a two years time (and doing the elections at the same
>> time as the DPL)?
> I think only voting in he same ballot will find wide acceptance
> amongst
> Given that almost all of the publicly reported problems with ballot
> validity I've seen have been due to getting the PGP signing wrong
> ... I find this conclusion highly dubious.
Good point; you're probably right. I did modify Smith's presentation
to textually separate the factual information
Barak A Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the above analysis of the 2003 DPL election, Smith notes:
> 200 votes were rejected as invalid versus 510 accepted as valid,
> even after 5 years of experience and the best software developers in
> the world voting and programming
> He t
You make some interesting points.
> I'm curious here:
> a.) Can you give any example of any election we've had so far that
> has resulted in an outcome not expected by the voters (that is based
> on the cast votes, not based on predictions)
I'm not sure if this fits your criterion, but according
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:35:25AM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote:
> I would define it like this:
>
> 1. Started using - the moment one installed his/her first Debian system.
> 2. Joined community - first post to the mailing list; most probably
>asking for advice or providing advice to somebody
> It's amazing how little things like dch (and all of devscripts in fact)
> make maintaining packages so much easier. Our newer maintainers might be
> horrified to hear that we didn't have build-depends back then; the dpkg
> changelog shows they were added Christmas day (!) 1999. And apt was only
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:09:19AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> So, I suspsect that I crafted the modemu changelog manually and had either a
> braino or a typo.
Common in those days, ISTR. It predates dch (from devscripts); I think the
only alternative was the changelog mode for emacs.
It's am
Your message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> I guess that depends on what you consider "joined". You might also
> consider your first posting to a Debian mailing list. Or possible, your
> first contribution (e.g., bug submission or patch submission).
I would define
12 matches
Mail list logo
