Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
jury from DDs and having their word (on who's right, on what punishment
is plausible) be absolutely final, with no appeal, ever?
I don't like it at first r
On jeu, 2007-05-31 at 17:19 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> How about improving the NM application process so that people don't
> have
> to spend 4 months waiting for an AM[1,2,3,4], or to have their
> accounts
> created [5,6,7,8], or to be approved by FD[6,7].
Is it really in "the NM application
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:19:43PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> How about improving the NM application process so that people don't have
> to spend 4 months waiting for an AM[1,2,3,4], or to have their accounts
> created [5,6,7,8], or to be approved by FD[6,7]. Then there might not be
> such a
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about improving the NM application process so that people don't have
> to spend 4 months waiting for an AM[1,2,3,4], or to have their accounts
> created [5,6,7,8], or to be approved by FD[6,7]. Then there might not be
> such a need for the DM concep
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: iso-8859-1, 49
> lines --]
>
> On Thursday 31 May 2007, Simon Huggins wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
>> > [..]
>> >
Наградна игра
За подршка ве молиме јавете се на бесплатниот тел 0800 1 или контактирајте не online
ДОМА l ФИТНЕС l УБАВИНА l ЗДРАВЈЕ l ДОМАЌИНСТВО &
On Thursday 31 May 2007, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
> > [..]
> > I think the process should involve:
> > - automated application process
>
> This shouldn't be tricky.
> Some webpage where the
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
> [..]
> I think the process should involve:
> - automated application process
This shouldn't be tricky.
Some webpage where the applicant applies and then they point some developers
at a
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me elaborate. Let's say that [A] insulted [B] publicly on some
> Debian mailing list. [A] of course would be responsible, and [B] could
> sue [A] in a Finnish court (and maybe even in some foreign court, too,
> but you would not get me to appear there)
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IANAL, but I understand that jurisdiction depends on who, what and
> where is involved. This project is a project of some organisations
> and they could be taken to court. Various people work on it and they
> could be taken to court if they were involved.
Yes,
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm intrigued. Considering that Debian Project is a non-legal,
> multinational entity, which courts would have what jurisdiction over
> which actions?
IANAL, but I understand that jurisdiction depends on who, what and
where is involved. This project is a
[Resent to d-project by Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
> or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
> jury from DDs and having the
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
[..]
> My best summary of Joerg's objections are:
[..]
> - it's taking over some of the DAM role (in principle if not
> precisely in practice) so should be done with DAM's approval
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> appeal route (an undo GR?) within the project and realise that if we
> go barking mad, there is *always* a possibility of Real-Life courts.
I'm intrigued. Considering that Debian Project is a non-legal,
multinational entity, which courts would have what jurisdi
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept, ie giving limited upload access
> to people prior to, or instead of, them becoming developers. [...]
I support this idea. One question: how to remove bad or MIA DMs?
> My idea was to have an annual round where an
Hey all,
As a slight distraction from other discussions going on, I'd like to
throw a couple of ideas out there for consideration, particularly with
debconf coming up and a chance for many of us to discuss things in person.
First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept, ie giving limited upload access
16 matches
Mail list logo
