I agree with joy's reply. Additionally...
I understand the reason why it was done, and it would certainly be great if
the Mozilla foundation had a sane Trademark license, but in the mean time I
would very much like if people remembered the G in DFSG a bit more often.
AFAIK the first proble
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:08:44AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> We're telling people that they can/should use Debian, and 5 minutes later
> I have to explain [...]
I sense a bit of frustration in here :) but it's not really necessary.
I mean, you also have to explain people why we e.g. don't
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:27:27AM +0200, Jacques-Louis KREISS wrote:
> I would like to know how you manage Schulze voting for the Debian project. I
> heard you use a perl script for computing the result. Is this script publicly
> available somewhere ?
>
> I'm responsible for a non-profit and wo
On Friday 13 April 2007 09:54, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
[paraphrasing the article I linked to]
> It's stupid that Debian renames Mozilla applications.
Yes, it is.
> Sure, let's drop the DFSG for lenny.
Seriously: it is very stupid that the licensing/trademark situation lead
Debian to rebra
Hi,
I would like to know how you manage Schulze voting for the Debian project. I
heard you use a perl script for computing the result. Is this script publicly
available somewhere ?
I'm responsible for a non-profit and would like to implement Schulze voting
inside my organization.
Thanks for a
Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
somebody who has a realistic view of the world?
The former.
Summarizing:
It's stupid that Debian renames Mozilla applications.
Sure, let's drop the DFSG for lenny.
There's an important bug in Linux.
Wow. Try repo
6 matches
Mail list logo
