Senhores,
tenho um problema besta, mas gostaria de saber como resolver. minha placa
mãe é p5nsli (ASUS) e o audio no painel frontal não funiona (obvio que
somente no painel traseiro). Mas no Windows funciona tanto o frontal quanto
o traseiro. Como posso resolver.
Grato desde já.
Evandro Pires da
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:33:40AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun Mar 25, 2007 at 01:24:39 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > Read the Debian mailing list archives and you will find some of the related
> > personal atacks.
>
> I asked for references, but you seem not to be
Hi,
On Sun Mar 25, 2007 at 01:24:39 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I asked you to point me to those "published personal attacks" and i did
> > > not ask you about your personal opinion about Mr. Bloch.
> > >
> > > Read what i wrote you, an
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I asked you to point me to those "published personal attacks" and i did
> > not ask you about your personal opinion about Mr. Bloch.
> >
> > Read what i wrote you, and then speak again!
>
> As Mr. Schilling answered all the other mails in this t
Hi,
On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 17:44:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I asked you to point me to those "published personal attacks" and i did
> not ask you about your personal opinion about Mr. Bloch.
>
> Read what i wrote you, and then speak again!
As Mr. Schilling answered all th
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GPL is known to be asymmetric (which is a problem) and even the founder
> > of Debian does not follow your strange ideas on interpreting the GPL.
> >
> > http://ianmurdock.com/?p=278
> >
> > (see 3rd paragraph)
> >
> Umm, Ian Murdock had
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not have the unlimited time to waste with useless speudo
> discussions. I am sorry, but this will be the last response to you
> unless you start to open your mind to the realit
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 05:13:04PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> They are not my guidelines. I imagine that the list guidelines and code
> of conduct were thouroughly vetted. However, I have not been around
> long enough to know. Perhaps someone who has been around longer can say
> for sure
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not have the unlimited time to waste with useless speudo
discussions. I am sorry, but this will be the last response to you
unless you start to open your mind to the reality.
For the same reason. this reply is shortened.
> > - dozens of unfixe
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >> Or does you not answering the arguments in my mails from shortly before
> >> we did the fork simply show that you do not have anything to reply to
> >> them, as there simply isnt anything valid against th
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:00:20PM +0100, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros?
> > >
> > > Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 02:08:10PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Distors are often viewed as mere packagers, but they tend to drive
> upstream development in variety of ways. Here's just a few of Debian's
> contributions to the world of FLOSS during 2006:
>
> * creation of cdrkit, a fork of
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:00:20PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros?
> > >
> > > Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
> > > in an answer f
On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Or does you not answering the arguments in my mails from shortly before
>> we did the fork simply show that you do not have anything to reply to
>> them, as there simply isnt anything valid against them? Instead you
>> simply told me I am a liar and s
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:07:34AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Please forgive me for feeding the troll.
No.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > There is no need to refute obviously wrong claims from Mr. Bloch.
> > If you believe his wrong claims, it seems that I cannot help you anyway.
>
> As you always and only hit on Eduard - does that mean my
Our Last pick Doubled in 48 hours
Experience a Charging Bull
Critical CARE NEW
SYm-C.C.T.I
Extremely b ullish at 20 Cents
Easy 300% on this one in Short term
This is a Real Business not a fly by night
Get in Monday, Don't Regret later!!
your game.'' The Nuggets have quite the saunter thanks to
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros?
> >
> > Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
> > in an answer from me.
> >
> The Code of Conduct for the Debian lists indicates that CCs ar
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:23:33PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> C'mon, you and almost everyone who replied to this thread
> Cc'ed Joerg so this should not be the point.
I (and I imagine others) have CC'd Joerg since he has done so. To me,
if someone CC's people it indicates that he wants a CC h
Hi,
* Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 20:10]:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
> > in an answer from me.
> >
> The Code
On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> There is no need to refute obviously wrong claims from Mr. Bloch.
> If you believe his wrong claims, it seems that I cannot help you anyway.
As you always and only hit on Eduard - does that mean my claims aren't
wrong?
Or does you not answering the
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > - the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
> > > find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
> > > causes damage to the reputation of the Debia
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
> > find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
> > causes damage to the reputation of the Debian project.
> >
> I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070324 17:45]:
> Read what i wrote you, and then speak again!
or rather not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:40:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> This fork harms the users of Debian in at least two ways:
>
> - the fork does not work decently and thus annoyes them
I am a Debian user. cdrkit certainly *does* work decently. Far better
than cdrecord, which only manages to comp
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 16:40:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Also note that I am not attacking people but only trying to inform about
> > the
> > truth while Mr. Bloch is constantly publishing personal attacks.
>
> Please point us to
Hi,
On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 17:28:36 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 16:40:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Also note that I am not attacking people but only trying to inform about
> > > the
> > > trut
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Joerg, as a piece of friendly advice, I think it would be wise to drop
> > it. You continue to do your reputation harm by going around making this
> > claim. Does Debian's fork
Hi,
On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 16:40:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Also note that I am not attacking people but only trying to inform about the
> truth while Mr. Bloch is constantly publishing personal attacks.
Please point us to those. I couldn't find those, only technical base
stuff with wel
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that the license change was definitely not the reason for the fork
> > (the
> > fork would have been done in a different way if the license change was the
> > reason).
>
> And again wrong, your license change *IS* the reason, we simply do not
>
Holger Levsen schrieb:
> First of all, thanks to Maik for bringing this up here!
Well, I'm a user of free software so this topic is in my very interest ;)
I totally missed you already brought this to the project mailing list -
I fired another mail to debian-project before noticing that. Sorry for
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You are not talking about a notable contribution but about a notable
> > damage to FLOSS caused by people who are unwilling to cooperate in a useful
> > way.
> >
> Joerg, as a piece of friendly advice, I think it would be wise to drop
> it. You
Hello,
I already brought this topic to the developer list, but I have been told
that this would be the better list for "political" things.
My original posting is
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/03/msg00559.html
To summarize the topic:
The WHATWG ( http://www.whatwg.org - that's mostly
Hi,
added -project to to: as its more appropriate there :)
On Friday 23 March 2007 18:26, Steve Greenland wrote:
> That's all true, but if the standard requires (or recommends) MPEG4
> support, then that's what everyone will use, and we'll be screwed,
> again. If we (the Free Software community)
On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>* creation of cdrkit, a fork of cdrtools, due to a change of licence
>>which happened to be DFSG-incompatible
> Note that there was a licence change with cdrtools but this was a change
> towards more freedom and the current official cdrtools are of c
Please forgive me for feeding the troll.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >Distors are often viewed as mere packagers, but they tend to drive
> >upstream development in variety of ways. Here's just a few of Debian's
> >contributions to the world of FLOSS durin
Joerg Schilling a écrit :
>> Distors are often viewed as mere packagers, but they tend to drive
>> upstream development in variety of ways. Here's just a few of Debian's
>> contributions to the world of FLOSS during 2006:
>
>> * creation of cdrkit, a fork of cdrtools, due to a change of licence
>>
>Distors are often viewed as mere packagers, but they tend to drive
>upstream development in variety of ways. Here's just a few of Debian's
>contributions to the world of FLOSS during 2006:
>* creation of cdrkit, a fork of cdrtools, due to a change of licence
>which happened to be DFSG-incompatib
Distors are often viewed as mere packagers, but they tend to drive
upstream development in variety of ways. Here's just a few of Debian's
contributions to the world of FLOSS during 2006:
* creation of cdrkit, a fork of cdrtools, due to a change of licence
which happened to be DFSG-incompatible
*
39 matches
Mail list logo
