Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Saturday 13 May 2006 15:12, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:58 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Most Jabber servers... > > > > topic is -irc-.debian.org, iirc > > Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Because it's irc.debian.or

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 13 May 2006 16:03, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Paul Johnson 2006-05-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Jabber fixes a lot of IRC's > > shortcomings, without bringing along all the political drama and baggage > > OFTC, Freenode, and every other IRC netw

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Paul Johnson 2006-05-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Jabber fixes a lot of IRC's > shortcomings, without bringing along all the political drama and baggage > OFTC, Freenode, and every other IRC network in existence. Switching to > another IRC network just s

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 13 May 2006 15:12, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:58 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Most Jabber servers... > > topic is -irc-.debian.org, iirc Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Jabber fixes a lot of IRC's shortcomings, without bringing along all the politic

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:58 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Most Jabber servers... topic is -irc-.debian.org, iirc -- Yves-Alexis Perez -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 13 May 2006 14:42, Noèl Köthe wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 30.04.2006, 19:34 +0100 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > > I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the > > official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see > > that more and more of my own Debi

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-13 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Sonntag, den 30.04.2006, 19:34 +0100 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the > official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see > that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to > the extent that I'm

Re: apt

2006-05-13 Thread Linas Žvirblis
Igor Bogomazov wrote: > I just received a mail from one friend of mine, he reported aptitude > retrieves updated package list from servers (included in > /etc/apt/sources.list) by diffs, i.e. does not download the whole > list, but only modifications (like patches). Sorry if I cannot > epxress cle

apt

2006-05-13 Thread Igor Bogomazov
Hello, I just received a mail from one friend of mine, he reported aptitude retrieves updated package list from servers (included in /etc/apt/sources.list) by diffs, i.e. does not download the whole list, but only modifications (like patches). Sorry if I cannot epxress clear. Please approve or re

Re: debian and UDEV

2006-05-13 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:50:27AM -0700, Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom) wrote: > ALL of the servers chosen to be reinstalled with a debian distro have > high performance raid controllers and fail installs due to UDEV issues. (I > hate that redhat handles this - I"m not really a fan of redhat). I hav

Re: Suggestion

2006-05-13 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Yann, The debian-project is a maillist focused on discussion about the Debian Project. For technical doubts and support questions you should use [EMAIL PROTECTED] You will also find support lists in other languages, just check http://lists

Re: debian and UDEV

2006-05-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sat, 13 May 2006 08:50:27 -0700 Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom) wrote: >I am not a fan of UDEV, [snip] I have contacted the hotplug people, [snip snip] > I prefer debian - but [snip] am going to deploy FC bordeaux instead. > >I am only reporting this to let people know that this is an issue,

debian and UDEV

2006-05-13 Thread Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom)
Hi, I am not a fan of UDEV, while I am a fan of debian. Its a shame that debian - in my experience - doesnt handle UDEV well. I have had problems with kernel version transitions as well as new installs. (High performance raid controllers from ICP-Vortex). I have contacted the hotplug people,

Re: [SUMMARY] About terminology for stable/testing/unstable and related issues

2006-05-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 09:54 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Adam D. Barratt: > > > On Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:26 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > >> Suite has already been used informally. For completeness, you should > >> also mention "section" (main, contrib, non-free) > >

Re: [SUMMARY] About terminology for stable/testing/unstable and related issues

2006-05-13 Thread Florian Weimer
* Adam D. Barratt: > On Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:26 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Christian Perrier: >> >>> Most concerns have been raised about my proposed use of "branch" for >>> talking about stable/testing/unstable. "Suite" seems better...suited, >>> indeed. >> >> Suite h