On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:26:50AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ottavio Caruso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Well, that's a bit offensive.
Yeah, using stupid, obviously bogus addresses is only acceptable in the
Mail-Followup-To field:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar dijo [Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:40:49PM +1000]:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:27:13AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >By the way, you could view debian participation as a sort of
> >professional certification. Some of the tasks have quite
> >detailed and testing requirements...
>
> So
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:27:13AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
>By the way, you could view debian participation as a sort of
>professional certification. Some of the tasks have quite
>detailed and testing requirements...
So, the NM process could then be renamed "Debian Professional
Certification".
Aníba
Ottavio Caruso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, that's a bit offensive.
> 1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
> professional certifications?
Not as far as I know.
> If not so, what's your personal opinion? Useful,
> useless, good, evil?
Useless, mostly evil.
> 2)
Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You may also want to ask some of the DD's who refuse to use freenode
> anymore. [...]
I mostly avoid freenode for years now, because:
- it's verbosity city, from the motd to the wallops
- its bizarre behaviours like NOIDPRIVMSG and +q are confusing
- it ai
Hi,
I was pretty neutral about whether we should pull
irc.debian.org away from freenode, but a recent incident makes me
wonder how developer friendly freenode is anymore.
After some discussion earlier in the day about music players,
ipods, and free software one can flash on i
I am looking to advertise with debian.org PLEASE
FORWARD THIS ON TO THE appropriate person. I am
looking to have a banner ad or some type of
advertisment on your site at the following page:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-portuguese/2004/05/msg00047.html
Please let me know what I can do to se
Em Dom, 2006-04-30 às 13:37 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
escreveu:
> > Debian is a volunteer project and has neither the inclination or
> > capability to run professional certifications, and is not involved or
> > partnering with any other organization to provide such. This does not
> >
On 10641 March 1977, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> - network stability: oftc annoys with many netsplits lately. This might
> be temporary, but in the last month it was extreme.
No, some were there, but not more than in Feenode.
> - nickserv/chanserv services differ. I'm receiving the expression
>
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:49:17PM +0100, Baruch Even wrote:
>
>>>AFAIK the period for proposals is over.
>>
>>The time to submit proposals is just now starting, it starts on 1st of
>>May 2006 according to the SoC Student FAQ.
>
>
> I was talking from the Debian point
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:37:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>>As has been mentioned on the -project and -private lists, Debian has
>>joined the Google Summer of Code programme, and project ideas are being
>>collected on the wiki [1]. Our participation is being admi
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:49:17PM +0100, Baruch Even wrote:
> > AFAIK the period for proposals is over.
> The time to submit proposals is just now starting, it starts on 1st of
> May 2006 according to the SoC Student FAQ.
I was talking from the Debian point of view: we have no more time to add
ne
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:37:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> As has been mentioned on the -project and -private lists, Debian has
> joined the Google Summer of Code programme, and project ideas are being
> collected on the wiki [1]. Our participation is being administered
> by Baruch Even, whom
Le Lun 1 Mai 2006 12:18, Frans Pop a écrit :
> One problem with branches is that you should also have a "trunk"
> (that which you branched away from), or at least a "root".
> Talking about the "stable branch" does not seem quite right to me;
> using "branch" for testing and unstable is quite natura
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:18:38PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I wanted to suggest to make more general use of the term suite.
> However, while writing this I (re)discover that there is a difference
> between "suite" and "suit" [1]. Until now I'd linked the term "suite" as
> used in Debian with "su
Em Dom, 2006-04-30 às 19:34 +0100, Steve McIntyre escreveu:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (cur
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:10:20AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> A recent discussion popped up in the French l10n mailing list
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2006/04/msg00539.html, in
> French) about the terminology to use for writing documentation and
> making reference to stabl
* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060430 20:35]:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (currently)
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:10, Christian Perrier wrote:
> My personal opinion is that we should maybe use "branch" rather than
> "distribution" to avoid that confusion. This is what the French team
> is considering (there are some people who object to this, though).
One problem with branches is that
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 10:10]:
> However, when looking at various original documentation we have in the
> project about this, it appears that some more consistency could be
> achieved. "distribution" is sometimes used (as in
> http://www.debian.org/releases/) but so is "sui
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Joe Smith wrote:
> If the move is done, the FN channels should be kept open and the
> topic should redirect users to OFTC. Then any packages that
> reference the FN channel should be updated.
My point was that the people who really need help just follow
irc.debian.org; the peo
On Mon, 1 May 2006 10:10:20 +0200 Christian Perrier wrote:
> Distribution: used to talk about Debian in general, whichever branch
> is used
>
> Branch (or suite): used to talk about stable, testing and unstable
>and explain differences between all of them or the
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >>Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> >>these days than IRC.
> >
> > Just to
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:24:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
> >>> biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
> >> Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big fl
A recent discussion popped up in the French l10n mailing list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2006/04/msg00539.html, in
French) about the terminology to use for writing documentation and
making reference to stable/testing/unstable in various parts of our
documentation/web site and even
25 matches
Mail list logo
