Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
>>> Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big flaw?
>>>
>> Because i
On Sunday 30 April 2006 15:51, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> > On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
> >
> > It is an Instant Messaging Client.
>
> It is not
On Sunday 30 April 2006 13:46, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> > these days than IRC.
>
> Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
Jabber is an open IM system that IETF is stand
On Sunday 30 April 2006 14:05, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Paul Johnson:
> > Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> > these days than IRC.
>
> Really? jabber.debian.net does not seem to accept new users.
I don't know about jabber.debian.net's registration process, how
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
>>> biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
>> Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big flaw?
>Because it's the default and practically no one changes it. This is
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
>
> It is an Instant Messaging Client.
It is not IRC though, so this point is moot. This thread is about IRC,
Dear Webmaster,
We would like to exchange links with your site, http://dmoz.org/.
Name: Open Directory - Sports: Greyhound Racing: Tracks: United States
URL: http://dmoz.org/
Description: Open Directory - Sports: Greyhound Racing: Tracks: United States
We have already added your site to the ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>>Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
>>these days than IRC.
>
> Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
>> biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
>>
> Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big flaw?
>
Because it's the default and p
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 04:55:38PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> If the move is done, the FN channels should be kept open
> and the topic should redirect users to OFTC.
It could just live on like it does now.
> Then any packages that reference the FN channel should be
> updated.
Packages should ment
* Paul Johnson:
> Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> these days than IRC.
Really? jabber.debian.net does not seem to accept new users.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> components I use, postfix, etc, etc etc. I think it might be better for
> us to try to use our influence as a huge source of users to try to
> better freenode than to just move.
We tried to do just that years ago. See how it worked out ?
JB.
--
"Don Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
that more and more of my own Debian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
>biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big flaw?
I think it would also be useful to know about those other issues you are
thin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
>official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
Yes, the lilo-haters have been saying this for years.
So far nobody proposed better arguments than "we do not like freenode".
FWIW,
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> these days than IRC.
Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
pgpOAzzLTRw7r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:34, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (currently)
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (currently) not on a
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve McIntyre]
>
>> I can see that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on
>> oftc, to the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode
>> channels at all.
>>
>
> For me it is the other way around. I am currently on one channel on
> OFTC, whi
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (currently) not on an
[Steve McIntyre]
> I can see that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on
> oftc, to the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode
> channels at all.
For me it is the other way around. I am currently on one channel on
OFTC, while I am on 7 channels on Freenode, 4 of them rela
Steve McIntyre schrieb am Sonntag, den 30. April 2006:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (current
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> Thoughts?
Go for it. Having half the project members on Freenode and the other
half on OFTC is just coun
On 4/30/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
the extent that I'm (currently) not
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
> the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode channels a
I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on oftc, to
the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode channels at
all.
On another front, oftc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2006 07:43 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2006-04-30 kello 03:30 -0700, Ottavio Caruso kirjoitti:
>
>>I have searched though the Debian website and this
>>mailing list and the only reference I have found is an
>>old Debian News regarding the
su, 2006-04-30 kello 03:30 -0700, Ottavio Caruso kirjoitti:
> I have searched though the Debian website and this
> mailing list and the only reference I have found is an
> old Debian News regarding the LPI. So my questions
> are:
>
> 1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
> professional certif
I have searched though the Debian website and this
mailing list and the only reference I have found is an
old Debian News regarding the LPI. So my questions
are:
1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
professional certifications?
If not so, what's your personal opinion? Useful,
useless, good,
29 matches
Mail list logo
