Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now, if there are people like that who are not DD's, the
> question we must ask, is wjy are they not DD's? If they are putting
> in the work, and have the same commitment as a DD does, even if they
> do not package stuff, why is the project not tre
> Please help out the MIA process. It would really be
> appreciated.
The MIA process does not address the type of people that are the
object of my complaints.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scripsit Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > It's argueably the most important right that is reserved for developers
>> > but it does not necessary stand to reason that it should be
* Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060404 19:41]:
> I guess the answer is 'not, and that's not a bad thing either'. For d-i and
> package descriptions etc. there are not upstream developers separate from
> Debian. I presume work on program translations should take place wherever
> upstre
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:18:59AM -0500, James Hardy wrote:
> Greetings!
>
>
>
> I am searching for a free Telugu font that I can install on my computer. I
> do not know enough about the software to ask specific questions. I would
> like to be able to do word processing and possibly publicati
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It's argueably the most important right that is reserved for developers
> > but it does not necessary stand to reason that it should be reserved
> > only for those who engage in
Greetings!
I am searching for a free Telugu font that I can install on my computer. I
do not know enough about the software to ask specific questions. I would
like to be able to do word processing and possibly publication using Telugu
font.
Do you have any suggestions on how I should procee
On Monday 03 April 2006 01:25, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 02/04/2006 alle 18.39 -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas ha scritto:
> > Well, personally I had debian-specific projects like d-i and debconf
> > translations in mind.
>
> And how could be that idea connected to upstream translation work?
On 4 Apr 2006, Clint Adams stated:
>> In other words, those who are responsible, decide.
>
> I agree. So let's divest of their voting privileges those DDs who
> don't contribute enough. We have several hundred of those.
Please help out the MIA process. It would really be
appreciated.
On 4 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill stated:
>
>> Most developers seem to agree that there are bugs in our process
>> for integrating new members into the project, but that's not the
>> same as saying that non-DDs should be allowed to vote
>
> Clearly not.
>
>> voting rights are one of the few privileg
On 4 Apr 2006, Henning Makholm verbalised:
> Scripsit Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On 3 Apr 2006, Wouter Verhelst outgrape:
>
>>> I don't have any problems per se with non-DD contributors being
>>> allowed to vote on matters of purely technical substance.
>
>> I have a problem with _any
On 4 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill spake thusly:
>
>> The problem is more one of 'how do we identify those people that
>> aren't a Developer, but that do contribute regularly'.
>
> There are a number of ways of doing this although, like NM, it's
> ultimately a human process that is carried out in the
> In other words, those who are responsible, decide.
I agree. So let's divest of their voting privileges those DDs who
don't contribute enough. We have several hundred of those.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Scripsit "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's argueably the most important right that is reserved for developers
> but it does not necessary stand to reason that it should be reserved
> only for those who engage in development.
>
> I'd like to see those who have made long-term, sustained,
Scripsit Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 3 Apr 2006, Wouter Verhelst outgrape:
>> I don't have any problems per se with non-DD contributors being
>> allowed to vote on matters of purely technical substance.
> I have a problem with _anyone_ voting on a matter of purely
> technic
Scripsit "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think that the fact that the upload keyring is the same as the
> voting keyring is bad. Contributors are told they can't vote until
> they learn C compiler flags.
Who tells contributors that nonsense?
--
Henning Makholm "How
Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
> Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It seems to me that we are already in a situation where only the
>> people who are really interested in, or informed about, a
>> particular question are voting on it.
>
> And that's bad because ...?
Oh, I wasn't suggesting
17 matches
Mail list logo
