On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:37:25PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:52:06PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > In reality, Debian used to allow "non-free non-programs" in Debian -- but
> > it
> > did so while issuing a Social Contract which said that Debian didn't allow
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:52:41PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what licenses do we currently have in Debian that
> use the patch exemption?
As far as I know, not many, which is why it seems like it shouldn't be
difficult to fix this. Josh Triplett asked this recently[1]; th
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:37:25 -0500, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So, I don't consider this a serious problem. I'd rather not spend
> more time on this. If you manage to convince many people of your
> position, more power to you. I'll preserve my energy for a more
> serious issue (t
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:52:06PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> In reality, Debian used to allow "non-free non-programs" in Debian -- but it
> did so while issuing a Social Contract which said that Debian didn't allow
> them in. That was untruthful on the part of Debian.
Debian did so befor
Dear
Sir / Dear Madam,
I
am an English>Romanian translator and I'd like to work with your
company.
Please
find below my
resume.
CURRICULUM
VITAE
First
name and surname: LIVIA - CLAUDIA SERBAN
Date
and place of birth: 19.01.1973 - Bucharest
Address:
Bucharest, str. Politehnicii nr
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also seems like an invitation for people to take non-legal invariant
> sections, stuff them inside the license, and claiming that they're part
> of the text.
True.
> Currently, this is a judgement call; the GPL's preamble
> is allowed, but I hope that
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, in all those cases. But you're missing the point in your rush to
> label people as dishonest liars.
I really don't want to label people as dishonest liars. I believe that
collectively the Debian Project has been misleading its users by providing a
Socia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>Nobody is lying. A "lie" is an untruth made with the intent to deceive.
OK, conceded. Debian is being untruthful. There, happier? I don't
particularly claim that there is an intent to deceive, but th
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 00:49, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > No, like chosing ati over nvidia for graphic cards, or silicon image
> > > over others for SATA cards.
> >
> >
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > No, like chosing ati over nvidia for graphic cards, or silicon image over
> > others for SATA cards.
>
> Wait a minute, did I miss a memo? ATI isn't the devil anymore?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> No, like chosing ati over nvidia for graphic cards, or silicon image over
> others for SATA cards.
Wait a minute, did I miss a memo? ATI isn't the devil anymore?
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
