Thomas Hoehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In case no japanese Debian user has told you yet - just to give you a
> hint: the word "etch" (written as H) in Japanese means "indecent",
> "lewd" or just "pornographic". Maybe you should rename this release or
> at least the japanese version...
I belie
Well, if it's written in English, (japanese) people mainly won't
associate with the special meaning.
Anyway, found the japanese translation here
http://debian.fam.cx/index.php?install#content_1_4 and it explains the
Toy-Story related name. So should be fine. But maybe some japanese
readers droo
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Thomas Hoehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In case no japanese Debian user has told you yet - just to give
> > you a hint: the word "etch" (written as H) in Japanese means
> > "indecent", "lewd" or just "pornographic". Maybe you should rename
> > this rel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hoehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In case no japanese Debian user has told you yet - just to give you a
> hint: the word "etch" (written as H) in Japanese means "indecent",
> "lewd" or just "pornographic". Maybe you should rename this release
In case no japanese Debian user has told you yet - just to give you a
hint: the word "etch" (written as H) in Japanese means "indecent",
"lewd" or just "pornographic". Maybe you should rename this release or
at least the japanese version...
TH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Matthew Palmer writes ("Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about
#debian operator]"):
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:50:54AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > It irritates us all. But I'd rather have substandard patches submitted
> > (just don't expect me to not go medieval o
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060103 16:12]:
> We do have a problem with this in Debian. You can say `please report
> it', but to whom ? Is there anyone who is able and willing to
> admonish (privately would probably be most helpful!) an unhelpful or
> obstructive maintainer ?
That has happ
Roger Leigh writes ("Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation"):
> That doesn't solve any problems. If you have a problem with a
> maintainer, please report it. Debian doesn't want unresponsive or
> unhelpful maintainers either, but if we are not made aware of a
> problem, it can't be dealt with.
(switchin
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Complaint about #debian operator"):
> As absurd as Andrew's comparison may seem, the diffs distributed from
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/ are pretty underwhelming as far as
> "contributing back to Debian" is concerned. [...]
I agree. That patch archive ma
9 matches
Mail list logo
