On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:11:59PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...] In the very same post Joey correctly added:
> > It's now only marginally larger than nvi [...]
> 167% is a rather big margin, isn't it?
Depends what it's a percentage of; if it were a perce
On Thursday 22 December 2005 22:53, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > The problem with this is that popcon tends to be self-selecting for
> > > "fan-boys".
> I don't know why it was dropped (in the back of
> my head I hear a little voice telling it was buggy or something
No, the reason was a rewrite of ta
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:19:58PM +0100]:
>
> [Chris Waters]
> > The problem with this is that popcon tends to be self-selecting for
> > "fan-boys". People setting up serious servers with Debian are not
> > going to be installing extraneous software like popcon, and casual
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...] In the very same post Joey correctly added:
> It's now only marginally larger than nvi [...]
167% is a rather big margin, isn't it?
> I asked Joey, as one of the installer maintainer, and for him the size
> increase is not a problem. If it is a pro
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:34, Alvin T. P. Brodbeck wrote:
> http://www.us.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/
>
> If I like to Download the 3.1r1, I got the following link to Download:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i3
>86-netinst.iso
Links hav
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 05:41:45PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > vim-tiny depends on the 200k-ish vim-common too, so nvi seems
> > about half the total size of a vim-tiny today.
> Okay, so that's not "about the same". Stefano? If the above numbers are
If this is some kind of insinuation, ... w
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect you have not tested the etch installation lately. The
> popularity-contest question is asked as part of the standard
> installation path, so it is no-longer just for the few that know about
> it. I do not know how you define "serious se
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Daniel Tasch wrote:
This is not just a problem in contries like India. I am in the US and am
still on dialup, and can only get 26k at that. I have to update my redhat
by mirroring the updates at work where I have a good connection, burning a
CD, and brining it home via "s
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Word from the DPL or SecTeam members would be welcome here - do they operate
> under the assumption that the security team are delegates?
For those who think it's worth delving into this topic, there's a message
on -private from
On Thursday, December 22, 2005 7:22 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> On Tuesday, 20 Dec 2005, you wrote:
[...]
>> So I hereby propose that this committee recommend to the
>> the Debian project leader the following individuals to be candidates
>> for induc
Hi, I found a error at:
http://www.us.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/
If I like to Download the 3.1r1, I got the following link to Download:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
Well, I changed this from 3.1._r0a to 3.1_r1 and it works
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Word from the DPL or SecTeam members would be welcome here - do they operate
> under the assumption that the security team are delegates?
I never have, personally.
My reasoning is soley based upon the idea that the team it
On Thursday 22 December 2005 12.08, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > Ah. To me, that is quite a bit of the missing piece of information on
> > why you feel this GR is needed. To me the GR sounds very much
> > wishy-washy, kind of 'let'
[Chris Waters]
> The problem with this is that popcon tends to be self-selecting for
> "fan-boys". People setting up serious servers with Debian are not
> going to be installing extraneous software like popcon, and casual
> users are unlikely to find it interesting enough to install even if
> the
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Ah. To me, that is quite a bit of the missing piece of information on why
> you feel this GR is needed. To me the GR sounds very much wishy-washy,
> kind of 'let's appoint some people who might then do some work.' With what
On Thursday 22 December 2005 09.59, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:54:36AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > Problem with a GR: it doesn't get any work done.
>
> Right; that's not the intention of the GR though -- the intention is
> to authorise people to do the work. I've done
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:54:36AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Problem with a GR: it doesn't get any work done.
Right; that's not the intention of the GR though -- the intention is
to authorise people to do the work. I've done all I feel I'm within my
rights to (and in fact slightly more tha
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:14:16PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> ] Looking at popcon, vim has
> ] about twice the amount of users as nvi
The problem with this is that popcon tends to be self-selecting for
"fan-boys". People setting up serious servers with Debian are not
going to be insta
* Martin Zobel-Helas:
> actually, i would like to know how this persons have been
> appointed/selected? Will this work like any other vote, so anyone can be
> recommented? Or does the CTTE need to assign this person by it's own?
No, the DPL and the Technical Committee handle this by themselves.
S
19 matches
Mail list logo
