So, here's what's been going on with the Debian-CC working group: we had a number of exchanges back and forth in the late summer, culminating in a draft license in early June. I pushed it too close to my wife's due date in making the response, and I've been dealing with a new baby in the last m
[Andrew Suffield]
> I thought that had been sent back to them some time ago... we've seen
> a draft that's probably okay except for a few details that are kinda
> uncertain and some wording that's just plain weird.
Right. Perhaps there is some confusion somewhere, as Mr. Lessig did
not know abou
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:08:01PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > What is the current status of the work going on to try to make some of
> > the Creative Commons licenses acceptable according to the Debian free
> > software guidelines? I know there were a workgroup being formed in
> > March, a
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's the shortage of "based on" that's the problem.
> "Assemble a 100 percent Debian core..."
> No, Debian does that. What do they mean?
If they take a subset of debian as their core, it would be 100
percent debian.
> | The DCC is not a Linux distributio
4 matches
Mail list logo
