Resignation? (Re: What the DFSG really says about trademarks)

2005-08-26 Thread Philip Hands
MJ Ray wrote: > Also, I want no part of this society, nor for it to suggest > support from me, and to avoid the inaccurate information it's > using about me. Those are personal rights DUS should respect > as the bare minimum to stop this and I need no GR for them. I _know_ that you've read the co

Re: [Spi-trademark] Re: What the DFSG really says about trademarks

2005-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:57:20AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > I do not want a strange not-for-profit *trading* as Debian here, > instead of just holding donations for debian. It would compete > with long-standing suppliers (debianshop.com?) and may deter > UK commercial support, which needs to grow.

Re: "Why" Debian Core Consortium ? Why not UserLinux? Why not Debian?

2005-08-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Benj. Mako Hill [Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:21:38 -0400]: > FWIW, I've also heard people complain that we have unfairly played up > our Debian roots. ;-) Now I'm curious, can you give some background about this? -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Ara que ets la meva

Re: What the DFSG really says about trademarks

2005-08-26 Thread MJ Ray
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > This would make it clear to everyone, SPI included, that we ought to > grant the trademark licence, and it would stop MJ Ray's > shit-stirring by making it clear that he could bugger the whole thing > up but only if he can get a General Resolution (for