On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:59:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:07:07PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> > > So a naming in the sense of "Debian Commercial Support Association"
> > > or something
On 8/22/05, Anthony Towns wrote:
[snip mostly sensible stuff]
> I certainly hope not, at least until you've learnt where the boundary is
> between speaking on behalf of yourself and speaking on behalf of Debian.
> The above crosses it, eg -- what makes you think Debian wants to accept as
> an offi
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:18:50PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I plan on working with both the leadership of the DCCA, the SPI
> trademark group, and Debian Developers to resolve this issue as
> amicably as possible, as rapidly as possible.
So, is this going to happen entirely behind the scenes,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:17:18PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Even if you missed it on some of the news sites, let me tell you:
> DCC will not be a fork.
Uh, yes it will. You're going to need to have your own packages to
implement LSB 3.0 compliance, and they're not going to end up tracking
e
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:07:07PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> > So a naming in the sense of "Debian Commercial Support Association"
> > or something along those lines would seem to make it clearer to me
> ... or just sti
Peter Vandenabeele writes:
> ... or just stick to the original "DCC" as "Debian Commercial Consortium".
Excellent suggestion.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ Ray wrote:
> Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
>
>>This sort of hijacking of our name is the reason for having a trademark on
>>it -- We should clearly protect our users from the confusion that the DCC
>>name is bound to cause by issuing a cease & desist letter forthwith.
>
>
> If
Am Freitag, 19. August 2005 22:46 schrieb Andre Felipe Machado:
> It is not clearly stated: " it will not be a fork, but a subproject inside
> Debian"
> And DCCA was already launched.
> Maybe I forgot some paragraph, but it would be nice to have some of the
> nice ideas implemented on Debian.
> Cou
Peter Vandenabeele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:18:50PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Please feel free to e-mail me at any time if you have questions or
>> wish to make a comment on the usage of the trademark; I will (as
>> usual) be participating on -project and -legal
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> So a naming in the sense of "Debian Commercial Support Association"
> or something along those lines would seem to make it clearer to me
... or just stick to the original "DCC" as "Debian Commercial Consortium".
For many custo
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:18:50PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Please feel free to e-mail me at any time if you have questions or
> wish to make a comment on the usage of the trademark; I will (as
> usual) be participating on -project and -legal.
I am not a Debian Developer, but when I look at t
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> This sort of hijacking of our name is the reason for having a trademark on
> it -- We should clearly protect our users from the confusion that the DCC
> name is bound to cause by issuing a cease & desist letter forthwith.
If the above argument is per
12 matches
Mail list logo
