On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:17:06PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> > On Mon Aug 15, 2005 at 10:14:09 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> >>I've pointed archive at saens -- it will take a little while to propogate.
> >>Of course, if there were reasons for not doing that, please tel
Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exclusivity? As in, the idea of making a trademark license an
> exclusive one in a given area or field? I think that would be a very
> bad idea with Debian.
Think of it in terms of namespace pollution. We complain about packages
called "Terminal", beca
> * Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 14:20]:
> > David, can we get something on the agenda for this? I do not have a
> > proposal but I would like to sound folks out and, if possible, have
> > Greg there as well.
>
> A proposal would be premature anyway imho.
In a more general sense, su
I wrote:
> "Z rejoices in the flames that his posts
> inspire", which is more or less the factual content of "Z's posts are
> trolls" [1] ...
Whoops, left out Footnote 1, which is my own take on the same topic as
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/troll.html :
FWIW, the origin of this usage o
* Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 14:20]:
> trademark list this week. In terms of DCC, that will be up the DPL
> and the SPI board who will, conveniently enough, be meeting tomorrow
> IIRC.
>
> David, can we get something on the agenda for this? I do not have a
> proposal but I would lik
On 8/15/05, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That does not extend to permit a group to go around making accusations
> and advocating that other people do something based on those
> accusations. In the real world, this is a tort, specifically
> defamation of character. And benefit of the
As the
above subject refers, I wish to appeal for sponsorship of my degree programme in
Transport & Logistics management. I hold a Diploma in the above mentioned
discipline but I strongly wish to further my studies if funds
avail.
Thank
you in advance
Liberty
194
Shortsone, Wate
> Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> >Greg Pomerantz tells me that guys still haven't talked yet about the
> >DCC and the Debian mark.
>
> What happened about this? I'm not involved in any way, but I'm quite
> interested.
AFAIK, Greg Pomerantz (SPI's lawyer) and Ian talked on the phone
yesterday. I'm stil
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:36AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> That does not extend to permit a group to go around making accusations
> and advocating that other people do something based on those
> accusations.
Yes Andrew, we know you think we're all idiot lemmings who believe everything
we'r
emails para mala direta com programas gratuitos emails para mala direta com
programas
gratuitos E-mails segmentados para divulgação - Cadastros de e-mail:
http://www.segmails.vze.com
ou
http://www.vendemails.cjb.net
ou
http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/webneggocios/listagemnova.htm
listagens listag
Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> On Mon Aug 15, 2005 at 10:14:09 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>
>>I've pointed archive at saens -- it will take a little while to propogate.
>>Of course, if there were reasons for not doing that, please tell me.
>
> saens doesn't have potato. Someone should update the arch
On Mon Aug 15, 2005 at 10:14:09 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> I've pointed archive at saens -- it will take a little while to propogate.
> Of course, if there were reasons for not doing that, please tell me.
saens doesn't have potato. Someone should update the archive.
Adam
--
Adam
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:56:32AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Andrew Suffield]
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >> Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
> >> you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
>
David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 20:30 -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping -c3 archive.debian.org
>>PING archive.debian.org (208.185.25.38): 56 data bytes
>>
>>--- archive.debian.org ping statistics ---
>>3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% pac
[Andrew Suffield]
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
>> you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
>> collectively killfile you.
>
> So what you're saying is that mob rule is accep
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:28:26PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Fortunately nobody needs to justify their decision to killfile
> you to anyone but themselves. Or even a decision for a group to
> collectively killfile you.
So what you're saying is that mob rule is acceptable to you.
I think that
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
Greg Pomerantz tells me that guys still haven't talked yet about the
DCC and the Debian mark.
What happened about this? I'm not involved in any way, but I'm quite
interested.
-Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
also sprach Suzanne M ODell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.15.0819 +0200]:
> I am afraid I may not be computer literate enough
> to use Debian. My board is an Intel D815EEA, with
> a 700mg Celeron processor, I cannot find info
> that tells me I can use this OS. I want to get
> away from XP as I just
18 matches
Mail list logo
