Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I wonder if it would be worth considering a "fsf-free" component that
offers a Packages file listing packages from non-free with the fsf-free
tag.
Personally I would like that. But making a separate Packages
Dear Webmaster,
We have just found your Internet site, http://dmoz.org/, and we'd like to swap
links with you.
Our links page can be found at
http://www.texas-hold-em-poker-online.info/links. Your
link, http://dmoz.org/, is displayed as follows:
Name: Open Directory - Sports: Greyhound Racin
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> I wonder if it would be worth considering a "fsf-free" component that
> offers a Packages file listing packages from non-free with the fsf-free
> tag. Something like that might be non-disruptive and make it simpler for
> the inst
Henning Makholm wrote:
modified-noncommercial-redistribution
nonprofit-mod-dist
unmodified-noncommercial-redistribution
nonprofit-dist
unmodified-commercial-redistribution
free-dist
all-freedoms-in-the-gfdl
fsf-free
dfsg-freedom-of-all-runnable-programs
free-software-and-firmware
Sven Luther wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:57:26AM +0100, Henning Makholm
>wrote:
>
>>Scripsit Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>This has the strong smell of ranking some DFSG criteria
>>>above others in importance. If you want this kind of
>>>distinction, I think a less discriminatory w
Moin!
Jutta Wrage wrote:
> After seeing the googlegroups spam in some of the debian mailing lists,
> I had a look into googlegroups and saw the meiling lists beeing fed
> into groups there. Is that a known fact and is it accepted?
Debian lists are fed into several public archives. I don't thin
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:03:30AM +0200, Jutta Wrage wrote:
> After seeing the googlegroups spam in some of the debian mailing lists,
> I had a look into googlegroups and saw the meiling lists beeing fed
> into groups there. Is that a known fact and is it accepted?
>
> I am a bit astonished as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
After seeing the googlegroups spam in some of the debian mailing lists,
I had a look into googlegroups and saw the meiling lists beeing fed
into groups there. Is that a known fact and is it accepted?
I am a bit astonished as mailing lists normall
Sehr geehrte Dame, sehr geehrter Herr,
in Ihrer eMail an einen Mitarbeiter des Malteser-Konzern wurde ein Virus
gefunden.
Ihre eMail wurde nicht an den Empfaenger uebermittelt.
Bitte ueberpruefen Sie Ihr System auf Viren oder verstaendigen Sie Ihren
Systemadministrator.
Setzen Sie sich in dri
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:57:26AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > This has the strong smell of ranking some DFSG criteria above others
> > in importance. If you want this kind of distinction, I think a less
> > discriminatory way would be to flag
10 matches
Mail list logo
