Re: *** SPAM *** Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)

2005-03-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:31:44PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > >Ok, this is the easy part, and also what the vancouver-proposal included, > >the > >difference comes in how the minority-arches are handled, and my proposal > >is a > >'including' proposal, while the vancouver-

Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)

2005-03-21 Thread Mike Fedyk
Sven Luther wrote: Ok, this is the easy part, and also what the vancouver-proposal included, the difference comes in how the minority-arches are handled, and my proposal is a 'including' proposal, while the vancouver-proposal was 'excluding'. 4) each non-tier1 arches will have its own testing infra

Re: Debian is inside OpenPuppets' world

2005-03-21 Thread Amaya
The Debian puppet is here: http://www.openpuppets.com/images/debian-p.png The image URL is broken in the english homepage. BTW, I am not really sure if this is just spam... -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ex

Re: Debian is inside OpenPuppets' world

2005-03-21 Thread Ben Pfaff
OrganicaDTM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We're proud to announce that our project OpenPuppets > has been upload new characters, including one for > Debian... a genie call Deb! Do you have an Ian puppet as well? -- Ben Pfaff email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: htt

Debian is inside OpenPuppets' world

2005-03-21 Thread OrganicaDTM
Hello, We're proud to announce that our project OpenPuppets has been upload new characters, including one for Debian... a genie call Deb! Others new projects are Ubuntu and OpenOficce. OpenPuppets' world is growing every month... new friends soon an

Re: New policy for http://www.debian.org/consultants/

2005-03-21 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tobias Toedter wrote: | On Thursday 10 February 2005 19:42, Luk Claes wrote: | |>>I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the |>>policy. Would this version be alright to use? |> |>No, because than the 'Some parts of the consul

Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)

2005-03-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:26:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's not so fair to perpetrate a straw man attack against Sven's whole > proposal just because he can't spell perfectly. Give the man credit > where it's due for trying to better Debian. Hehe, no offense taken, and i can understa

Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?)

2005-03-21 Thread foo_bar_baz_boo-deb
It's not so fair to perpetrate a straw man attack against Sven's whole proposal just because he can't spell perfectly. Give the man credit where it's due for trying to better Debian. BTW, Sven and the Vancouver crew, I appreciate your collective thinking about what's right for Debian and the minor