On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:35:51PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > Or is the whole Ubuntu thing (where I understand Mark Shuttleworth has hired
> > a large number of the senior Debian developers) considered to be the
> > solut
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > We don't have any use for money right now. What we have
> > mostly just sits in a bank account getting slowly devalued by
> > inflation. So fund raising exercises aren't really a good idea.
>
> Oh. Okay at least I don't have
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:16:53PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > Isn't this a great idea that Debian could borrow? I think this could
> > > > generate some nice publicity/income for the Debian project, I mean
> > > > you've already got the domain name. Personaly I'
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > We don't have any use for money right now. What we have
> > mostly just sits in a bank account getting slowly devalued by
> > inflation. So fund raising exercises aren't really a good idea.
>
> Oh. Okay at least I don't have to feel bad about us
Pete writes:
> Surely Debian has developers that would love to spend more time working
> on Debian than on their day-jobs, but don't do so because they need to
> pay the rent etc?
I'm sure I'm not the only developer who would love to paid to work on
Debian, but I don't think Debian has ever contem
Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > We don't have any use for money right now. What we have
> > mostly just sits in a bank account getting slowly devalued by
> > inflation. So fund raising exercises aren't really a good idea.
>
> Oh. Okay at least I don't have to feel bad about using Debian and not
>
> We don't have any use for money right now. What we have
> mostly just sits in a bank account getting slowly devalued by
> inflation. So fund raising exercises aren't really a good idea.
Oh. Okay at least I don't have to feel bad about using Debian and not
contributing, but I have to say I find
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > Isn't this a great idea that Debian could borrow? I think this could
> > > generate some nice publicity/income for the Debian project, I mean
> > > you've already got the domain name. Personaly I'd rather donate to
> > > Debian than to the FSF, I think Debian needs i
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 04:42:35PM +0100, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > I was looking to make a contribution to some aspect of the open source
> > movement and noticed that the FSF (in America at least) gives 5 email
> > aliases in the member.fsf.org domain, see
> > https://agia.fsf.org/associat
> Agreed. I think it is a *bad* idea, we have enough problems
> getting consensus on what developers using @debian.org
> addresses can do with their "Debian work email address", and
> what they cannot do with it.
>
> There is absolutely no need to add more trouble to the mix.
> There is no wa
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Pete van der Spoel wrote:
> > Isn't this a great idea that Debian could borrow? I think this could
> > generate some nice publicity/income for the Debian project, I mean
> > you've already got the domain name. Personaly I'd rather donate to
> > Debian than to the FSF, I thin
Hi all,
I first mailed my suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], who redirected me here. My
mail is below, hopefully not everyone is as negative as Joey ;-)
Regards,
Pete
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Martin Schulze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 30 november 2004 16:21
Aan: Pete
12 matches
Mail list logo
