Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Glenn Maynard:
>
>> I don't believe that enforcing software patents is a legitimate "legal
>> right" that needs to be protected.
>
> There is no such thing, "software patents" is misleading. We are
> concerned with patents that can be infringed by software, not patents
Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:30:13 +0200, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> I don't believe that enforcing software patents is a legitimate "legal
>> right" that needs to be protected.
>
>
> It is fine that you think that people who sue for patent infringement are
> naughty, but it is also
John Hasler wrote:
> Michael Poole writes:
>> Company B's "defensive" claims also affect all other users of the
>> original software -- now that they attempt to enforce their patent
>> rights, no other users can assume themselves to be safe.
>
> Why do you assume that company B's claims must have
I would like to help sponsor your
site. My only request is a link back to me from your site. Please let me know if
you are open to this and what the privilege might be worth.
Regards,
John Economou
Hotel Directory
http://www.hotel-directory.com
¶l¥ó±K¿ýºÊ±±µ{¦¡-·Qª¾¹D§O¤Hµo¤°»ò«H¶Ü?
kt[zuPyUonqVecmdsRL{XEQND^\hBlWSwiYTJ]COrZKIpxjgMAb`a_FvGHf
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:49:10 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: SMTP COMPONENT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="big5"
Content-Trans
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:02:49PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> It is bad patent law which favours patent owners. It is fine to use
> copyright licences to "correct" copyright law, but using copyright
> licences to "correct" non-copyright law - be it patent law, gun
> control law or nuclear technology
6 matches
Mail list logo
