Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Recently, we've begun seeing more licenses that are designed to
> discourage patent lawsuits. They usually involve something along the
> lines of "If you engage in patent action against the licensor, bad
> things will happen".
>
> "Patent action against the licensor" usua
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:05:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> The GPL does much the same. If someone distributes GPLed software
>> without complying with section 3 (which gives you various ways in which
>> you have to make source code available to
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:55:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> Yes.The `apt-get install hardened? was an example of something 100% easy
> to use :D
Unfortunately whilst easy to use is good the idea of rebuilding the
packages presented so far isn't going to be easy to setup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
[...]
Good, at least you understand that :)
|>
|>Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not know what a
|>DoS attack is?
|>
|>[...]
|
|
| Duty of Shame ?
| OK, leaving the Fun Mode off...
|
Hi John,
El sáb, 18-09-2004 a las 00:20, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Good, at least you understand that :)
>
> |>
> |>Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not k
I've authorized and asked ffis e.V. (the keeper of Debian money in
Europe) to donate 1,000 EUR to the Foundation for a Free Information
Infrastructure (FFII). FFII supports the development of public
information goods based on copyright, free competition, and open
standards. Some of their current
Hi John!
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 21:51, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> | Hi John,
> |
> | El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
> |
> |>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi John,
|
| El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
|
|>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>
|>
|>Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
|>| Hi,
|>|
|>
|>[...]
|>
[...]
Hi John,
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
>
> [...]
>
> | Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
> | *We* must provide the best
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:05:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The GPL does much the same. If someone distributes GPLed software
> without complying with section 3 (which gives you various ways in which
> you have to make source code available to the recipient), then they lose
> the right to us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi,
|
[...]
| Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
| *We* must provide the best (and the easiest) way to harden Debian for
| advanced users, sysadmins or just people that want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Such a clause excludes certain (or more likely undefinded) person
> subgroups from the rights all other user get for this software. Not per
> default, but after a certain action of the user, but the software
> restricts its use to certain person subgr
Hi,
I do not want to try to decide whether the FSF oder the OSI consider such
licenses as free or non-free. I also do not know whether such Clauses are
covered by the DFSG. I just want to list a few Reasons why I consider such
licenses as strictly non-free and would prefer Debian to consider the s
13 matches
Mail list logo
