On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:04:22PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>...
> [2] Instead of simply opening and closing a bug, we should track which
> releases the bug appeared in, and which releases it's fixed in. Some of
>...
> Comments?
Note that this requires (besides the technical infrastructure)
add
to, 2004-03-25 kello 23:25, Jonathan Walther kirjoitti:
> I prefer my fellow Debian brothers to develop rhinocerous hides. :-)
I, however, have shed mine and don't intend to grow a new one. I'd
rather be passive and a lurker.
--
http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:34:35PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
Converting people to daily-digest mode is something that both Pascal and
I talked about recently. Considering the amount of acrimony various
participants have had, seen recently on debian-vote, and the fact that
some of the public (and
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:04:22PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what list I should be posting this to. There doesn't
> seem to be a list specifically for discussion about the bug tracking
> system (though there are plenty of operational bts lists).
debian-debbugs
> As I underst
I'm not quite sure what list I should be posting this to. There doesn't
seem to be a list specifically for discussion about the bug tracking
system (though there are plenty of operational bts lists).
As I understand it, we're about to see an upgrade to the bug tracking
system where closing a bug
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:34:35PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Converting people to daily-digest mode is something that both Pascal and
> I talked about recently. Considering the amount of acrimony various
> participants have had, seen recently on debian-vote, and the fact that
> some of the publi
6 matches
Mail list logo
