Re: Which cds do i really need...

2004-02-29 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:13:52PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:17:46PM -0800, Colin Gibson wrote: > > I am interested in downloading debian linux simply to > > try the operating system out. > > > > If possible I would like to download only what is > > absolutely neces

Re: Which cds do i really need...

2004-02-29 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:17:46PM -0800, Colin Gibson wrote: > I am interested in downloading debian linux simply to > try the operating system out. > > If possible I would like to download only what is > absolutely necessary (as well as a few of the programs > to test). > > Therefore I would

Which cds do i really need...

2004-02-29 Thread Colin Gibson
I am interested in downloading debian linux simply to try the operating system out. If possible I would like to download only what is absolutely necessary (as well as a few of the programs to test). Therefore I would like to know which of the cd's would cater for this, if possible. Sometimes

Re: Usage of Debian Structure Documentation, Social Contract etc

2004-02-29 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Peter Cowley (I'm Cc-ing you because I assume that you are not on the list) |Anyway, to cut a long story short, someone mentioned the structure |that the Debian community uses and I would be very keen to be able to |use most of your community's structures and rules etc as a base fo

Re: Debian logos

2004-02-29 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > The Debian logo{, and all other non-free parts of the Debian website > > listed here, if there are any} are licensed according to the GNU GPL > > {LGPL|X|?} license. > > This isn't really necessary.

Re: Debian logos

2004-02-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > The Debian logo{, and all other non-free parts of the Debian website > listed here, if there are any} are licensed according to the GNU GPL > {LGPL|X|?} license. This isn't really necessary. All that is necessary is that any additional work placed on d

Re: Debian logos

2004-02-29 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 15:41, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 03:18:38PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > Why should our logo not be Free? > > No reason. I think we've actually tried to do this before now and hit > some snag or other, and just not cared enough to press the issue >