Bug#210879: Last Microsoft Security Update

2003-10-24 Thread Technical Services
ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans

Bug#210879: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- "K Developers" ... "not integers"

2003-10-24 Thread MJ Ray
I do not tell you to go away. I tell you to try another approach. To be clearer, I advise you to: 1. stop adding irrelevant information to this bug report; 2. develop a clear and generally understood description of the bug on -project or -devel; 3. get agreement from developers that this rea

Bug#210879: Reopen: revise odd language in 'constitution.txt' -- "K Developers" ... "not integers"

2003-10-24 Thread Alfie Costa
On 22 Oct 2003, at 18:53, MJ Ray wrote: > New data does not necessarily translate to new information. Yeah. And it also depends on the "translator". A man shouldn't try to critique grammar in his third language unless he's quite a linguist and there's nobody else available. I have doubts abo

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-10-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-24 10:57]: > No, not even on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe Anthony banned him after the > close+reopen war on that glibc bug. That's about it. I have warned him > to make the process more transparent the last time he did that, but it > still hasn't happened.

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-10-24 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:31:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Presumably, the fact of his banning was discussed there, the reason > documented, the person who did it identified, and the circumstances > under which the ban would be lifted described. No, not even on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe