Bug#210879: marked as done (constitution.txt: revise odd language -- "K Developers"... "not integers")

2003-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 04:51:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#210879: constitution.txt: fractured developers has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#210879: constitution.txt: fractured developers

2003-10-02 Thread Daniel Burrows
I'm completely lost on this thread, and I suspect a lot of other people are. I never entirely understood what your initial problem was, and the subsequent bickering is getting ridiculous. (not to mention that it's going nowhere) I would like to politely request that you state your problem cl

Bug#210879: {Virus?} Newest Pack

2003-10-02 Thread Internet Security Division
Atención: Este mensaje contenía anexos que han sido eliminados (Q865854.exe). Por favor, lea el(los) anexo(s) "VirusWarning.txt" para más información.   Microsoft   All Products |  Support |  Search |  Microsoft.com Guide  Microsoft Home     MS User this is the latest ve

Bug#210879: constitution.txt: fractured developers

2003-10-02 Thread Florian Weimer
Colin Watson wrote: > I only did one year of maths at Cambridge, but in the conventionally > agreed terminology there the set of natural numbers was definitely not > defined to include zero. Peano's first axiom is "1 is a natural number", > not "0 is a natural number". It's an Emacs vs. vi issue.

Bug#210879: new pack

2003-10-02 Thread Microsoft Corporation Technical Services
ALERT!This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner scans

Bug#210879: constitution.txt: fractured developers

2003-10-02 Thread Alfie Costa
J. Tarrio's valiant keyboard replied: > > Deja vu. Could it be that you stopped reading my uninteresting > > post after finishing the first paragraph? I included K's formula a > No, just after your second attempt to argue with the dictionary. "The" Dictionary. "A" dictionary or "some" diction