Concerned World Citizen, Student, Educator, Office-Holder and Activist:
(This and similar messages are being shared by email and/or fax among
female and male students, faculty, staff, activists, citizens and
gender balanced officeholders, in over 80 institutions and at least
45 countries, who are
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 05:17:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Duncan Findlay writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4"):
> > Other considerations, many of these are taken from Branden Robinson,
> > whose e-mails you don't seem to read anymore:
> ...
> > 2) You need to explain w
Manoj Srivastava writes ("A different approach to a conflict resolution
document"):
> Well, given that I have deep philosophical differences with
> the document Ian is crafting, and acknowledging that one ought to
> have an alternative, I have decided to start an collaborative effort
>
Duncan Findlay writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4"):
> Other considerations, many of these are taken from Branden Robinson,
> whose e-mails you don't seem to read anymore:
...
> 2) You need to explain what you mean by the Project Leadership
> explicitly (I suggest you add
Duncan Findlay writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #5"):
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:01:55AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This is my current working draft. As ever, do please send this list,
> > or me privately, any substantive comments you have on it.
>
> Will you please
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4"):
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My experience is that sensible conversations about eg bug
> > reports can easily become derailed by categorical statements
> > like that by the maintainer. The results are
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> i am currently working in vietnam, and me and some people here want to
> start a bit of a linux advocacy campaign because open software is really
> not very popular here.
Great! Please go ahead!
> it would be two parts actually, one series of linux flyers targeted at
> any
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> sorry for crossposting this to debian-project but a quick look at the
> archive showed that the signal/noise ratio in debian-publicity, where
> this mail should go to, is 0. sad btw.
The list is no more, so debian-project@lists.debian.org is the proper
place.
Regards,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 23:01:14 -0600,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do we envisage this document being used? When shall people
> refer to it?
when someone files an ITP, or someone comments on an ITP
> What kinds of conflicts can be thus resolved?
"don't bloat the Debian ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
