Disputes between developers - draft guidelines

Here's my latest draft, incorporating all the comments I've seen so far (when I agreed). DISPUTES BETWEEN DEVELOPERS A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators. 1. Motivation Debian is a very

Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines

Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines"): ... > 4) "Slanging match" may be a little too colloquial for a formal > document with an international audience. How about `shouting match' ? > 5) I appreciate your willingness to delete the sentence about "go away >

Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines

Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines"): > Man, talk about being talked down to. You're absolutely right, it's a very patronising document. But I think that's unavoidable given the content, and I think we do need the content because we have, unfortunately, a

Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines

(I've taken leader@ and debian-ctte@ off the CC list. I hope that meets with people's approval. If not, or if [EMAIL PROTECTED] wants out too, please let me know.) Adam Heath writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines"): > I have been seen in public reopening bugs that have been

We help you to realize the dream of travelling in China

charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-885