Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines"):
> I'm not interested in having a private discussion about public issues;
> I'll reply to your points on -project without quoting your private
> message.
I don't have time right now to deal with any of the substantive s
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:36:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Anyone considering voting for me, don't, because none of you moronic pieces
> > of shit are worthy of my leadership.
[...]
> > What!? That is by far the dumbest f
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) "flamage" appears in The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing and the
> Jargon file; "flameage" appears in neither. It might be best to avoid
> this word altogether and substitute something like "emotional
> rhetoric".
Flames
At Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:25:09 -0500,
Branden Robinson wrote:
> 8) I was unaware that RFC 1738[2] had been obsoleted. Could you please
> advise me as to which RFC supersedes it?
It's not obsoleted, but it's updated by RFC1808, RFC2368 and RFC2396
RFC1808 - Relative Uniform Resource Locators
RFC
FROM:DR.VICTOR PETERS
TELEPHONE:-234-803-315-7926
FAX:-234-1-7592821
CHIEF FINANCIAL DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL
COMMISSION (INEC)
LAGOS NIGERIA
ATTENTION:-Sir,
It is my warmest pleasure writing you this confidential business offer
irrespective of the fact that we have not met befor
FROM:DR.VICTOR PETERS
TELEPHONE:-234-803-315-7926
FAX:-234-1-7592821
CHIEF FINANCIAL DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL
COMMISSION (INEC)
LAGOS NIGERIA
ATTENTION:-Sir,
It is my warmest pleasure writing you this confidential business offer
irrespective of the fact that we have not met befor
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> I disapprove of the `wontfix' tag, in principle. It seems to me that
Ian> there are three possible relevant situations:
Ian> * There is a deficiency in the package, but perhaps the maintainer
Ian> does not have time or expertise t
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Man, talk about being talked down to.
Ian> DISPUTES BETWEEN DEVELOPERS
Ian> A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the
Ian> Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
> DISPUTES BETWEEN DEVELOPERS
>
> A *DRAFT* joint recommendation of the the Technical Committee, the
> Project Leader and the Bug Tracking System Administrators.
Good work from you and also Branden's corrections.
Once the document is ready
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:38:13AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm not sure the issue of severities needs dealing with explicitly
> here.
It needs to be dealt with somewhere, and the Technical Committee has
explicitly punted on resolving such disputes.
If we don't discuss the issue in this docume
[in reply to a private message of iwj's that discusses nothing in
confidence]
So that I do not quote Ian's private mail to me, I will simply enumerate
the substance of the issues raised.
0) In a document that is supposed to speak for a large collective, I
think it is important to minimize the num
Before I comment on any of the actual points below, I'd like to make some
statements first.
I have been seen in public reopening bugs that have been incorrectly closed by
bad changelog entries. I have done this with my [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat on.
However,
this wrong. I still feel very strongly o
12 matches
Mail list logo
