tluxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> >
> > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen
> > > > or
> > > > what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:30:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> It should be
> debian-user-woody
> debian-user-sid
> _or_
> debian-user-testing
> debian-user-unstable
> if anything at all (I don't comment on the necessity as I don't read
> -user currently).
>
> The latter two having th
Hi tluxt!
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> Actually, the more I think about what such a list should be about,
> and what it's name should be, the more I think we should have two lists:
>
> debian-woody-user
> debian-sid-user
It should be
debian-user-woody
debian-user-sid
_or_
debian-u
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
>
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen or
> > > what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of the words debian,
> > > user and beta would work and it
4 matches
Mail list logo
