Re: DMUP

2000-09-28 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:40:13AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Should we mention the Debian Machine Usage Policy to our applicants? > I think it might be a wise thing to do, at least in passing > >Julian I think it is a good idea. I would even go the extra step to ask the prospective de

Re: your mail

2000-09-28 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Ralf Treinen wrote: > What is the procedure after an appliant is put on hold? Will he > automatically be refused after some time, or do I (the AM) decide > myself what happens next? What happens next is up to the applicant. Until the applicant can resolve the communication pr

Problem application

2000-09-28 Thread Dale Scheetz
We have an applicant, who has just recently made it to an AM, who has been accused of being untrustworthy by other members of the community. I first heard about this person (and I'm not going to report his name just yet, if at all), when the moderator of one of the Italian IRC channels dropped me

Re: please reassign my charges (again)

2000-09-28 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > On 27 Sep 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not working on NM for a while. Please reassign my applicants and do > > not > > assign any more. > > I would like to take over Rene Mayrhofer from Shaleh. He is also from > Aust

Re: please reassign my charges (again)

2000-09-28 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
On 27 Sep 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not working on NM for a while. Please reassign my applicants and do not > assign any more. I would like to take over Rene Mayrhofer from Shaleh. He is also from Austria and I think it would be a good idea for it is even possib