Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:09:54PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Roberto
> > >
> > > Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
>
The problem is line 2011 in
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.05/Resource/Init/gs_init.ps:
systemdict /getenv {pop //false} put
change that to
systemdict /getenv {pop //false} .forceput
(gs-commits 99e331527d541a8f01ad5455c4eb2aabd67281a6) and it works.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the security
> patches merged (which hasn't happened so far :-/), so this needs to be
> reported
> upstream.
>
Would that be to ghostscript upstream? I guess t
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the security
> > patches merged (which hasn't happened so far :-/), so this needs to be
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvatore mentioned that the same bug occurs when unstable has the
> > > se
Hi Edgar,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:01:53AM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> The problem is line 2011 in
> /usr/share/ghostscript/9.05/Resource/Init/gs_init.ps:
> systemdict /getenv {pop //false} put
> change that to
> systemdict /getenv {pop //false} .forceput
> (gs-commits 99e331527d541a8
Hi
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:40:12AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > >
>
Please note that, through 9.05~dfsg-6.3+deb7u3 in debian-security, this also
breaks oldstable since the day before yesterday.
I wonder why that update got pushed through although it was (for two weeks)
known to have severe issues.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Edgar Fuss has now posted where the bug actually seem to be. I'm
> currently building ghostscript with that.
>
Excellent. If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy
package and upload it. Let me know if you ne
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:40:12AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 840691 + confirmed pending
Bug #840691 [libgs9] libgs9: security update DSA-3691-1 breaks zathura, evince,
... in jessie
Bug #842154 [libgs9] evince: Crashed while opening PS document
Added tag(s) pending and confirmed.
Added tag(s) confirme
> If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy package and upload it.
I didn’t look at the jessie package but it is wheezy with debian-security where
I figured out that changing that ,,put’’ to ,,.forceput’’ made evince display
PostScript again.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > If it works, I will apply the same patch to the wheezy package and upload
> > it.
> I didn’t look at the jessie package but it is wheezy with debian-security
> where I figured out that changing that ,,put’’ to ,,.forceput’’ made evinc
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Packages with that patch added are now as well on
>
> https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/ghostscript/
>
> Please test those if possible for you.
>
Salvatore,
Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to
Hi Roberto,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
> be certain.
Yes exactly, that's the plan. I would still like to hear
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> > DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
> > be ce
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the previous
> > > DSA?
Hi Francesco,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update to the prev
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > > I
19 matches
Mail list logo
