Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:49:47 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Cc'ing package maintainer of poppler-data...! Hi, Jonas. Long time no see from NYC :) > Duplicated code in Debian is a problem. Yes, yes. I know poppler-data and cmap-adobe* has duplicated mapping data. - cmap-adobe comes from the

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Hideki, On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:25:20AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:49:47 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Cc'ing package maintainer of poppler-data...! Hi, Jonas. Long time no see from NYC :) Duplicated code in Debian is a problem. Yes, yes. I know poppler-dat

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Kenshi, (or is Muto more appropriate? - sorry, I am never really sure) On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:14:26PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: (I'm so sorry about I've been inactive nowadays) No problem. Better, though, would be if you agree to move packages under the Printing Team umbrella. You n

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 01/25/2011 12:14 PM, Kenshi Muto wrote: Hi Jonas and Till, (I'm so sorry about I've been inactive nowadays) At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:38:03 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I noticed

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 01/25/2011 01:38 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for [Ubuntu] dropped the indirection of CMap files. I am not knowledgeable in DeFoMa, but

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-25 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi Jonas and Till, (I'm so sorry about I've been inactive nowadays) At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:38:03 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > >On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for [Ubuntu] dropped the indirection of CMap files. I am not knowledgeable in DeFoMa, but recent changelog entry of gs-cjk-resource seems

Re: Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-24 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 01/24/2011 09:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi Till and others (esp. gs-cjk-resource maintainers), I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for [Ubuntu] dropped the indirection of CMap files. I am not knowledgeable in DeFoMa, but recent changelog entry of gs-cjk-resource seems to indicat

Ghostscript CMap files

2011-01-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Till and others (esp. gs-cjk-resource maintainers), I noticed that recent Ghostscript packaging for [Ubuntu] dropped the indirection of CMap files. I am not knowledgeable in DeFoMa, but recent changelog entry of gs-cjk-resource seems to indicate that even dropping DeFoMa it still makes se