Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 12:30:18)
> Le 28 août 2013 11:28, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit :
>>
>> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53)
>>> Without so bump and transition of libcms because abi breakage is
>>> subbtle (change of padding on structure...), code
Le 28 août 2013 11:28, "Jonas Smedegaard" a écrit :
>
> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53)
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21)
> >>> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit :
>
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53)
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21)
>>> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit :
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
> On 0
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21)
> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]d...@jones.dk> a écrit :
>>
>> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
>> > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
>>
Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" a écrit :
>
> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
> > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
> > >> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken
> > >> from the system,
On 08/25/2013 09:10 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
>> On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken
from the system, no convenien
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
> On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
> >> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken
> >> from the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not
> >> know w
On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
>> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from
>> the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know
>> whether all of these libraries are actually available in
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from
> the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know
> whether all of these libraries are actually available in Debian or
> whether there are some being newer in U
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from
> the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know
> whether all of these libraries are actually available in Debian or
> whether there are some being newer in U
Jonas, thank you for the info.
GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from the
system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know whether
all of these libraries are actually available in Debian or whether there
are some being newer in Ubuntu than in Debian or
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 12:48:36)
> is Ghostscript in Debian still maintained?
Yes.
> Or is there anything in Ghostscript 9.06 and newer which does not
> allow its use in Debian? If so please tell the problem or report it
> directly upstream (and please post the upstream bug links h
Hi,
is Ghostscript in Debian still maintained? Or is there anything in
Ghostscript 9.06 and newer which does not allow its use in Debian? If so
please tell the problem or report it directly upstream (and please post
the upstream bug links here). If Ghostscript as it is now is not
suitable for Debi
13 matches
Mail list logo
